Acquista Criptovalute
Paga con
USD
USD
Buy & Sell
Hot
Supports Visa, Mastercard, SEPA & more
P2P
0 Fees
Flexible trading, zero fees
Gate Card
Use your crypto for payments worldwide
Mercati
Trading
Basic
Advanced
Futures
Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Opzioni
Hot
Trade European-style Vanilla Options
Conto unificato
Massimizza l'efficienza del tuo capitale
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Guadagna
Lancia
CandyDrop
Raccogli le caramelle per guadagnare airdrop
Launchpool
Staking rapido, guadagna potenziali nuovi token
HODLer Airdrop
Fai holding GT e ottieni enormi airdrop gratuitamente
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Investimento
Square
Square
Post, share, and explore crypto trends
Live
moments live
Live crypto market analysis
Chat
Chat with crypto traders
News
What is happening in crypto
flower_head
Altro
Promozioni
AI
Altro
TradFi
WCTC S8
Rewards
MET

Prezzo Metlife Inc

Closed
MET
$78,28
+$0,61(+0,78%)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-29 00:33 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-29 00:33, Metlife Inc (MET) is priced at $78,28, with a total market cap of $51,04B, a P/E ratio of 15,53, and a dividend yield of 2,89%. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $77,81 and $79,12. The current price is 0,60% above the day's low and 1,06% below the day's high, with a trading volume of 2,97M. Over the past 52 weeks, MET has traded between $67,60 to $79,12, and the current price is -1,06% away from the 52-week high.

MET Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$77,67
Market Cap$51,04B
Volume2,97M
P/E Ratio15,53
Dividend Yield (TTM)2,89%
Dividend Amount$0,56
Diluted EPS (TTM)5,08
Net Income (FY)$3,37B
Revenue (FY)$77,08B
Earnings Date2026-05-06
EPS Estimate2,22
Revenue Estimate$19,47B
Shares Outstanding657,17M
Beta (1Y)0.733
Ex-Dividend Date2026-02-03
Dividend Payment Date2026-03-10

About MET

MetLife, Inc., a financial services company, provides insurance, annuities, employee benefits, and asset management services worldwide. It operates through five segments: U.S.; Asia; Latin America; Europe, the Middle East and Africa; and MetLife Holdings. The company offers life, dental, group short-and long-term disability, individual disability, pet insurance, accidental death and dismemberment, vision, and accident and health coverages, as well as prepaid legal plans; administrative services-only arrangements to employers; and general and separate account, and synthetic guaranteed interest contracts, as well as private floating rate funding agreements. It also provides pension risk transfers, institutional income annuities, structured settlements, and capital markets investment products; and other products and services, such as life insurance products and funding agreements for funding postretirement benefits, as well as company, bank, or trust-owned life insurance used to finance nonqualified benefit programs for executives. In addition, it provides fixed, indexed-linked, and variable annuities; and pension products; regular savings products; whole and term life, endowments, universal and variable life, and group life products; longevity reinsurance solutions; credit insurance products; and protection against long-term health care services. MetLife, Inc. was founded in 1863 and is headquartered in New York, New York.
SectorFinancial Services
IndustryInsurance - Life
CEOMichel Abbas Khalaf
HeadquartersNew York City,NY,US
Official Websitehttps://www.metlife.com
Employees (FY)46,00K
Average Revenue (1Y)$1,67M
Net Income per Employee$73,45K

Ulteriori informazioni su Metlife Inc (MET)

Blogs

TWV0ZW9yYSAoTUVUKSBzdXBlcmEgaWwgNTAlIGluIHVuIHNvbG8gZ2lvcm5vOiByaXZhbHV0YXppb25lIGRlbCBwcm90b2NvbGxvIGRpIGxpcXVpZGl0w6AgZGkgU29sYW5hIGUgYW5hbGlzaSBkZWwgbWVjY2FuaXNtbyBETE1N

TWV0ZW9yYSAoTUVUKSDDqCBhdW1lbnRhdG8gZGkgb2x0cmUgaWwgNTAlIGluIHVuIHNvbG8gZ2lvcm5vLCBjb24gdW4gdm9sdW1lIGRpIHNjYW1iaSBuZWxsZSAyNCBvcmUgY2hlIGhhIHJhZ2dpdW50byBjaXJjYSAyNTkgbWlsaW9uaSBkaSBkb2xsYXJpLg==

2026-04-24

QW5hbGlzaSBkZWxsZSBwb2xpdGljaGUgU0VDIGRpIFBhdWwgQXRraW5zOiB1biBjYW1iaWFtZW50byBjb21wbGV0byBuZWwgcXVhZHJvIG5vcm1hdGl2byBzdGF0dW5pdGVuc2UgcGVyIGxhIGNvbmZvcm1pdMOgIGNyeXB0byAyMDI14oCTMjAyNg==

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

2026-04-21

T25kYXRhIGRpIGRlbGV2ZXJhZ2luZyBzdSBFVEg6IDMyMC4wMDAgRVRIIGEgcmlzY2hpbyBsaXF1aWRhemlvbmXigJRJbCBtZXJjYXRvIHNpIHN0YSBhdnZpY2luYW5kbyBhIHVuYSBzb2dsaWEgY3JpdGljYT8=

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

2026-02-06

Metlife Inc (MET) FAQ

What's the stock price of Metlife Inc (MET) today?

x
Metlife Inc (MET) is currently trading at $78,28, with a 24h change of +0,78%. The 52-week trading range is $67,60–$79,12.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Metlife Inc (MET)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Metlife Inc (MET)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Metlife Inc (MET)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Metlife Inc (MET)?

x

Should you buy or sell Metlife Inc (MET) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Metlife Inc (MET)?

x

How to buy Metlife Inc (MET) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

MET
CFD
Fai trading

Metlife Inc (MET) Latest News

2026-04-24 12:52

TradeStation Integrates Tradetron To Enable Automated Options Trading for Retail Traders

Gate News message, April 24 — TradeStation has integrated Tradetron, an automation platform, into its execution infrastructure through an API connection, enabling traders to build, test, and automate options strategies directly within the brokerage environment. The integration allows traders to construct multi-leg options strategies (strategies involving multiple positions or conditions) using a visual interface or pre-configured models, validate them through simulated trading, and automate execution once predefined criteria are met. John Bartleman, President and CEO of TradeStation Group, stated that the integration "provides a way to automate strategies, test them, and execute when conditions are met, while maintaining full control over strategy design and management." The move reflects a broader industry trend to democratize algorithmic trading by reducing the technical barriers traditionally required for automated execution. The integration comes amid elevated options trading activity; U.S.-listed options exceeded 15 billion contracts in 2025, marking multiple consecutive years of record volume. However, automated trading carries inherent risks, including execution errors, system outages, and potential deviations between backtested (historically simulated) performance and live market conditions, particularly during volatility. Traders must carefully design and monitor strategies to mitigate these risks.

2026-04-21 23:52

Four Tokens Now Available to New York Residents on Major CEX

Gate News message, April 21 — A major centralized exchange announced on April 22 that Meteora (MET), ArcBlock (ABT), Karrat (KARRAT), and World Mobile Token (WMTX) are now available to New York residents on its website and iOS and Android applications. Users can buy, sell, exchange, send, receive, or store these assets. The exchange holds a virtual currency business activity license issued by the New York State Department of Financial Services.

2026-04-02 02:41

Meteora：与 Drift 协议无任何交互，平台资金安全

Gate News 消息，4 月 2 日，Solana 流动性协议 Meteora 发布声明表示，Meteora 上所有资金均安全，平台所有功能及金库均未与 Drift 协议交互。

2026-03-26 01:45

DeFi 2025 年链上收益达 80 亿美元，AMM 手续费贡献超半

Gate News 消息，3 月 26 日，据研究员 Vadym 分析，DeFi 于 2025 年产生约 80 亿美元链上收益。其中，AMM 交易手续费为最大收益来源，约 42 亿美元，Uniswap、Meteora 及 Raydium 合计占比 62%。借贷利息位居第二，约 17.6 亿美元，Aave、Morpho 等货币市场贡献超 DeFi 总 TVL 的 60%，但约半数借贷需求属循环杠杆操作。RWA 贡献 6 至 9 亿美元，美国国债占 RWA 市场约 41%。永续合约资金费率贡献约 3 亿美元，主要来自 Ethena。数据显示，以太坊生态中逾半稳定币存款收益低于美国国债利率，保险承保、链上期权等潜在收益来源仍未充分开发。以 Sky（前身 MakerDAO）为例，其约 70% 收入源自链下资产，反映 TradFi 收益正通过许可渠道加速流入 DeFi。

2026-03-03 00:20

Pump.fun移动端已支持在竞对平台上发行的代币及其他非原生资产

PANews 3月3日消息，据The Block报道，Solana生态Meme币发行平台Pump.fun宣布通过其移动应用新增对竞争对手平台发行的代币及其他非原生资产的支持。用户现可交易基于Solana的其他代币发行平台如Raydium和Meteora上发行的代币，以及通过Wormhole桥接的封装比特币和封装以太坊，还有Gigachad和PENGU等成熟代币。Pump.fun表示，此举旨在降低交易摩擦，让用户无需离开App即可主导链上操作。

Hot Posts su Metlife Inc (MET)

K-LinePoet

K-LinePoet

5 minuti fa
2026年4月15日至17日国际货币基金组织/世界银行春季会议期间，中国人民银行副行长宣昌能出席了全球主权债务圆桌会、金融行动特别工作组部长级会议等会议。出席全球主权债务圆桌会期间，宣昌能表示，近期中东局势推高全球通胀预期，抬升融资成本，进一步加重发展中国家偿债负担。各方应加强多边合作，坚持“共同行动、公平负担”原则，推动私人部门按照可比方式参与重组。各方应推动完善全球主权债务治理体系，支持发展中国家在发展中解决债务问题，改进国际货币基金组织和世界银行的低收入国家债务可持续性分析框架。（中国人民银行）
0
0
0
0
SleepTrader

SleepTrader

6 minuti fa
_Allison Raley is a partner at Arnall Golden Gregory LLP and co-chair of the firm’s Emerging Technologies industry team. A former global tech general counsel and chief compliance officer for a financial services company, she brings a distinct business focused approach to her client representation. She can be reached at [email protected]._ * * * **Discover top fintech news and events!** **Subscribe to FinTech Weekly's newsletter** **Read by executives at JP Morgan, Coinbase, Blackrock, Klarna and more** * * * The United States banking system relies on an intricate web of federal and state regulators to govern new institutions seeking to obtain bank charters. The licensing and regulatory processes ensure that chartered banks meet capital requirements, maintain effective governance, and protect consumers. These processes can last several months or even years, reflecting the complexity of modern financial products and the need to uphold safety and soundness. Many fintech companies once avoided seeking a bank charter, fearing the associated regulatory burdens. Rapid innovation in financial technology often conflicts with the lengthy process and high costs of obtaining a banking license. As a result, many fintech startups partner with existing banks or operate in spaces that do not require a full banking license. **However, during the Trump administration, changes in regulatory attitudes suggest a more welcoming climate for fintech firms interested in seeking bank charters**. The Evolution of the Chartering Process --------------------------------------- Bank licensing in the United States occurs at both the federal and state levels. Applicants for a federal charter generally apply through the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), while state banking departments oversee state-chartered institutions.** Both types of charters impose thorough examinations** of proposed business plans, capital adequacy, managerial competence, and compliance frameworks. **Fintech companies often find these requirements daunting**. Providing digital-only services or novel lending models can create immediate tension with conservative compliance mandates shaped by decades of traditional banking practice. **Yet many fintech companies have realized that a charter can enhance credibility** and remove the operational hurdles associated with navigating a patchwork of individual state licenses. A banking license also lets a company accept insured deposits (if it secures Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation approval) and export interest rates from a single home state nationwide — a significant advantage for consumer and small-business lenders. Applying for a Traditional OCC Bank Charter ------------------------------------------- A traditional bank charter application with the OCC involves multiple stages. First, organizers submit a written proposal outlining their strategic plan, corporate governance structure, proposed capital levels, and the qualifications of prospective directors and management. The OCC conducts a prefiling meeting with the organizers to discuss anticipated regulatory issues and gauge the feasibility of the proposed institution. Organizers then file a formal application, paying careful attention to key components: 2. Business Plan: Fintech applicants must clearly articulate how their technology-driven strategies fit within the framework of banking operations, including details on asset composition, lending activities, and risk controls. 4. Capital Requirements: Applicants must demonstrate that their initial capitalization meets or exceeds regulatory minimums and that they have a sustainable plan to support growth. 6. Governance and Management: The OCC reviews the expertise and track records of directors and executive officers. Fintech companies often supplement their teams with banking veterans to reassure regulators of their institutional knowledge. 8. Compliance and Risk Management: Because fintechs frequently use algorithmic tools, digital platforms, and innovative lending models, the OCC scrutinizes how they will comply with anti-money laundering (AML) rules, consumer protection statutes, and cybersecurity standards. During the review period, the OCC may issue requests for additional information, clarifications, or modifications to the proposal. Applicants should expect at least one round of revisions before receiving preliminary approval, which grants organizers permission to proceed with capital raising and final operational setup. Once the OCC confirms that the institution has met all conditions, it grants a final charter, enabling the bank to commence operations. This process demands a substantial commitment of time and resources. Yet fintech executives appreciate that a national charter allows them to serve customers consistently in all 50 states without juggling a myriad of state-specific licenses. With a national bank charter, fintech companies place themselves under a single regulatory authority, simplifying compliance and potentially broadening their product offerings. State-Based Special Purpose Charters as an Alternative ------------------------------------------------------ For companies wary of the OCC’s rigorous process or seeking more specialized privileges, state-based special purpose charters may offer an alternative. Several states, including Wyoming, Utah, and New York, have created or explored tailored banking frameworks for fintech entities. These special purpose charters can address innovative business models that do not require the full range of activities associated with a traditional bank. * Wyoming’s Special Purpose Depository Institution (SPDI): Wyoming introduced the SPDI charter for companies dealing with digital assets and blockchain technologies. SPDIs operate as fully reserved institutions, meaning they hold sufficient assets to match customer deposits without engaging in traditional lending. * Utah’s Industrial Loan Company (ILC): Utah has a longstanding tradition of granting ILC charters to a variety of financial services companies. These charters permit certain banking activities, such as lending and issuing deposits, but limit the range of permissible commercial operations. * New York’s BitLicense: While not exactly a bank charter, the BitLicense remains a leading example of a state-level, fintech-focused regulatory framework. Issued by the New York State Department of Financial Services, it governs virtual currency activities and underscores a broader willingness among states to regulate new financial technologies in a more targeted manner. Companies that receive these state-based special purpose charters can gain entry to parts of the financial sector without subjecting themselves to full national bank regulation. However, they may still face limitations, including restrictions on accepting federally insured deposits and potential complications regarding interstate operations. Depending on the business model, a special purpose charter may offer a more streamlined path than a full bank charter, but it does not necessarily confer all the privileges or geographic reach of a traditional national bank license. **OCC Fintech Charter and Trump-Era Developments** -------------------------------------------------- In 2016, just before the first Trump administration, the OCC proposed a special purpose national bank charter for fintech companies. Although this proposal preceded President Trump, his administration emphasized deregulation and encouraged a more permissive environment for financial innovation. Joseph Otting, Comptroller of the Currency from 2017 to 2020, advocated for modernizing banking regulations and indicated that special purpose charters could spur competition and growth. The OCC also established the Office of Innovation, instructing fintech applicants to engage early and frequently with regulators. By streamlining communication and clarifying expectations, the OCC attempted to reduce the uncertainty that deters some fintechs from applying for traditional charters. These moves, combined with the Trump administration’s broader deregulatory stance, encouraged technology-focused companies to consider charter applications that might have once appeared prohibitively burdensome. Alongside the OCC, the FDIC signaled openness to deposit insurance applications from innovative fintech enterprises. **This openness gave fintech startups additional confidence** as FDIC insurance enables them to accept insured deposits and removes reliance on intermediary banks. Despite lawsuits from certain state regulators who argued that national fintech charters threatened state sovereignty, several fintech companies pushed forward. The Trump administration’s readiness to experiment with new charter structures made many entrepreneurs reconsider the traditional “rent-a-bank” model in favor of obtaining a more direct regulatory framework. This trend was met with mixed reactions as consumer advocates worried that a lax regulatory approach could allow high-cost credit products or insufficiently tested financial models to proliferate. Nevertheless, fintech leaders found the environment to be more hospitable than under previous administrations. **Looking Ahead** ----------------- Under President Trump’s current administration, regulators embrace fintech’s expanding role in the financial industry. The lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic continue to highlight the demand for inclusive, digital financial services, adding momentum to fintech solutions. Agencies now confront a clear mandate: modernize the chartering framework to keep pace with rapid technological change while upholding stability and accountability throughout the banking system. Although administrative priorities often shift, most experts agree that the drive to integrate fintech will persist. By exercising regulatory flexibility, agencies can bring emerging technologies under a coherent supervisory umbrella, encourage innovation, and safeguard consumers. State-based special purpose charters already serve niche markets, and the OCC actively refines avenues for special purpose national banks to foster additional competition. Fintech companies therefore receive a consistent message. The federal regime, though deliberate, welcomes responsible innovation, while state programs stand ready when a federal charter proves impractical. The dialogue around bank charters has permanently evolved; fintech leaders now recognize that securing a charter can deliver long-term advantages that outweigh the initial compliance burden. With sustained collaboration between regulators and innovators, the banking sector will continue to transform, driven by technology, guided by sound governance, and strengthened by a balance between entrepreneurial freedom and robust consumer protection.
0
0
0
0
AirdropBlackHole

AirdropBlackHole

40 minuti fa
On April 29, Bloomberg reported that OpenAI rebuffed concerns about its sales growth on Tuesday, stating that despite reports indicating the AI startup has not met internal targets, its consumer and enterprise business is 'running at full speed.' OpenAI noted that the company continues to see growing demand from commercial clients and emerging advertising businesses. In a statement, OpenAI said, 'The internal atmosphere is extremely positive.' The Wall Street Journal reported later on Monday that OpenAI failed to meet several internal goals as competitors catch up. OpenAI described the report as 'typical clickbait.' Shares of several of OpenAI's investors and partners, including SoftBank Group, Oracle, and CoreWeave, fell in response on Tuesday. The Wall Street Journal also reported that OpenAI's Chief Financial Officer Sarah Friar expressed concerns that if sales growth does not accelerate, the company may not be able to meet its future computing needs. The stock price fluctuations highlight OpenAI's central position in a complex network of investments and deals involving major cloud providers and chip manufacturers. Investors have previously expressed heightened concerns over an AI infrastructure bubble, questioning OpenAI and other tech companies' plans to invest hundreds of billions in data centers and chips over the coming years. In its statement on Tuesday, OpenAI reiterated that its pursuit of more computing power is seen as 'an important driver' that enables it to 'provide better product experiences for customers.' Earlier this month, OpenAI informed investors that its early efforts to significantly expand computing resources have given it a crucial advantage over long-term competitor Anthropic as it closes the gap. However, even before the Wall Street Journal report, OpenAI had begun to adopt a more cautious approach to its infrastructure investments. OpenAI's key data center partner, Oracle, stated on Tuesday that it remains 'extremely excited' about its collaboration with the AI developer. CoreWeave noted that OpenAI is not the only partner of the company, stating that its clients also include Google's parent company Alphabet, Meta, Anthropic, and Microsoft, adding that 'demand for computing power continues to grow.'
0
0
0
0