Recently I've seen quite a few projects dusting off the old "points" trick again.


Washing volume, daily check-ins, and whether you can actually redeem everything depends on the team's mood... After seeing enough of these, they all blur together and it's hard to get genuinely invested.
But @RealGoOfficial's design actually caught my attention – it feels genuinely different.
It doesn't just treat users as tools, but quantifies all daily behaviors into points assets.
For example, when you catch and train creatures in the game, participate in PVP battles, hold genesis mining pets, or complete ecosystem tasks, none of these actions go to waste. They all accumulate as points, which directly link to airdrop eligibility, ecosystem rights, and activity thresholds.
The key isn't the points themselves, but what behaviors they're actually incentivizing.
Some projects encourage rampant volume farming, and studios end up running the show;
Some only look at lockups, liquidity gets completely drained;
Others rely on social virality for short-term hype, then crash to zero long-term.
RealGo is more like a composite model: time investment + genuine gameplay participation + asset binding.
It's not something you can max out in a day, and pure whale spending won't get you a free ride either. It's more about filtering for users willing to stay in the ecosystem long-term.
This actually answers a very practical question –
Does the project want farmers, or does it want real players?
If points only count tasks, they'll be gamed quickly;
If only capital matters, regular users are immediately locked out.
Tying "play behavior + holdings + participation" together might not pull people in as aggressively short-term, but long-term it's more likely to build retention and value cycles.
Especially if future airdrops are deeply tied to points,
Those seemingly ordinary daily behaviors early on could become core assets.
A lot of people instinctively reject anything points-related now, and I get it.
But consider this differently: not all points are worth farming. Some points are essentially pre-distributing future rights.
Which category does RealGo fall into?
Personally, I think it's worth observing for a while longer to see if they can actually execute this mechanism properly.
查看原文
post-image
此頁面可能包含第三方內容,僅供參考(非陳述或保證),不應被視為 Gate 認可其觀點表述,也不得被視為財務或專業建議。詳見聲明
  • 打賞
  • 留言
  • 轉發
  • 分享
留言
請輸入留言內容
請輸入留言內容
暫無留言