LI

LI Auto Price

Closed
LI
$18,23
-$0,56(-%2,98)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-16 07:49 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-16 07:49, LI Auto (LI) is priced at $18,23, with a total market cap of $18,29B, a P/E ratio of 109,04, and a dividend yield of %0,00. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $18,00 and $18,28. The current price is %1,27 above the day's low and %0,27 below the day's high, with a trading volume of 3,80M. Over the past 52 weeks, LI has traded between $15,71 to $32,02, and the current price is -%43,06 away from the 52-week high.

LI Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$18,74
Market Cap$18,29B
Volume3,80M
P/E Ratio109,04
Dividend Yield (TTM)%0,00
Diluted EPS (TTM)0,55
Net Income (FY)$1,09B
Revenue (FY)$109,25B
Earnings Date2026-06-04
EPS Estimate0,26
Revenue Estimate$3,19B
Shares Outstanding976,34M
Beta (1Y)0.585

About LI

Li Auto Inc. operates in the energy vehicle market in the People's Republic of China. It designs, develops, manufactures, and sells premium smart electric vehicles. The company's product line comprises MPVs and sport utility vehicles. It offers sales and after sales management, and technology development and corporate management services, as well as purchases manufacturing equipment. The company offers its products through online and offline channels. The company was formerly known as Leading Ideal Inc. and changed its name to Li Auto Inc. in July 2020. Li Auto Inc. was founded in 2015 and is headquartered in Beijing, the People's Republic of China.
SectorConsumer Cyclical
IndustryAuto - Manufacturers
CEOXiang Li
HeadquartersBeijing,None,CN
Official Websitehttps://www.lixiang.com
Employees (FY)6,04K
Average Revenue (1Y)$18,08M
Net Income per Employee$181,06K

Learn More about LI Auto (LI)

Gate Learn Articles

LI.FI has secured $29 million in Series A funding to further expand its cross-chain liquidity infrastructure.

Berlin-based cross-chain infrastructure protocol LI.FI has successfully closed a new Series A funding round, raising $29 million and pushing its total funding to over $51.7 million. Specializing in cross-chain liquidity aggregation, LI.FI continues to integrate decentralized exchanges and cross-chain bridges to create a unified liquidity layer supporting multi-chain asset swaps. The company aims to deliver seamless cross-chain infrastructure for Web3 developers.

2025-12-12

<p>Republished from "Cobo Stablecoin Weekly No.19: After the Stablecoin Act Passes, Where Is the Next “Battleground”?"</p> <h3 id="h3-5biC5Zy65qaC6KeI5LiO5aKe6ZW/5Lqu54K5">Market Overview & Growth Highlights</h3><p>The total stablecoin market capitalization reached $269.696 billion, up $2.606 billion from the previous week. USDT remains the clear market leader with a 61.25% share. USDC comes in second with a $64.502 billion market cap, representing 23.92% market share.</p> <h2 id="h2-5Yy65Z2X6ZO+572R57uc5YiG5biD56iz5a6a5biB5biC5YC85YmN5LiJ572R57uc77ya">Top 3 Blockchain Networks by Stablecoin Market Cap:</h2><ol> <li>Ethereum: $135.786 billion</li><li>Tron: $82.995 billion</li><li>Solana: $11.431 billion</li></ol> <h3 id="h3-5ZGo5aKe6ZW/5pyA5b+r55qE572R57ucIFRPUDPvvJo=">Top 3 Fastest-Growing Networks This Week:</h3><ol> <li>Berachain: +96.57% (USDT: 43.15% share)</li><li>XRPL: +49.84% (RLUSD: 49.11% share)</li><li>Sei: +47.95% (USDC: 85.96% share)</li></ol> <p>Source: DefiLlama</p> <h2 id="h2-8J+Or+e+juWbveOAiumTtuihjOS/neWvhuazleOAi+WSjOeos+WumuW4geaUr+S7mOeahOmakOengeimgeaxgg==">U.S. Bank Secrecy Act and Stablecoin Payment Privacy Requirements</h2><p>After the U.S. Stablecoin Act passed, privacy is now the next key concern for both regulators and the market.</p> <p>With stablecoin market cap breaking $270 billion and moving rapidly into mainstream payments, the “total transparency” of on-chain transactions is exposing new issues. On a public blockchain, every transaction is permanently accessible, which means that for enterprises, complete financial histories, supply chain details, and payroll structures become visible to competitors. While a nuisance for retail users, this is a hard stop for institutions and businesses. Real-time visibility enables competitors to track every payment. Without a solution, stablecoin adoption in commercial payments and institutional settlements will be seriously limited.</p> <p>Should privacy remain a hurdle, stablecoin institutional and commercial adoption will stall. Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal recently noted that for the GENIUS Act and similar laws to be effective, simultaneous upgrades to the Bank Secrecy Act are essential. The current system is inefficient and creates centralized data honeypots of sensitive data, which are hacker targets and offer minimal benefits for anti-money laundering.</p> <p>Grewal emphasized privacy and security should not be mutually exclusive. Emerging technologies like zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP) and decentralized identity (DID) now provide “compliance verification without disclosing raw user data,” so institutions can view only the results of compliance checks—not the full data sets. This balances data minimization and effective regulation. He called for the U.S. Treasury Department to lead public-private collaboration, accelerate compliance processes that are ZKP-ready, focus monitoring on suspicious transaction triggers, and apply AI-driven risk control models to improve screening. The result: privacy protection without undermining regulatory rigor, removing obstacles to large-scale institutional adoption of stablecoins, and helping the US maintain global digital asset leadership.</p> <h2 id="h2-8J+Or+e+juWbveWIqeaBr+emgeS7pOS4i++8jOeos+WumuW4geeahOOAjOWlluWKsee7j+a1juWtpuOAjQ==">U.S. Interest Ban Spurs New Stablecoin “Reward Economics”</h2><p>Regulatory restrictions often spark unexpected innovation. The GENIUS Act prohibits stablecoin issuers from paying interest, intended to curb risky behaviors, but instead accelerated explosive growth in yield-oriented stablecoins. Since the Act, products like Ethena’s USDe have added billions in supply, using exchange funding rates (not Treasuries) for yields—sidestepping legal restrictions entirely.</p> <p>In this regulatory gap, Coinbase and PayPal have reframed stablecoin returns as “rewards,” circumventing issuer-only rules. Coinbase, acting as a USDC distributor, passes on Circle’s earnings to users. PayPal uses Paxos to isolate issuer risk and still delivers 4.5% annualized returns. Anchorage and Ethena Labs have even linked stablecoin yields to tokenized assets like BlackRock’s BUIDL, enabling compliant institutional yield channels.</p> <p>Paying returns to holders is a key strategy for attracting capital in both emerging and established markets. Coinbase has even API-integrated “interest rewards” via a wallet SDK, lowering integration barriers for developers. In high-inflation markets such as Latin America, Slash’s USDSL delivers a 4.5% annual reward, leveraging dollar-denominated assets to attract rapid inflows. Stablecoins are applying more complex, compliant financial engineering, efficiently channeling returns from underlying assets and rewriting user and value dynamics.</p> <h3 id="h3-8J+Or+mmmea4r+OAiueos+WumuW4geadoeS+i+OAi+eUn+aViOeahOWFs+mUruivjeKAlOKAlOmAj+aYjuS4juWFqOmTvui3r+ebkeeuoQ==">Transparency & End-to-End Oversight: The Core of Hong Kong’s Stablecoin Regulation</h3><p>With Hong Kong’s Stablecoin Ordinance now in force, market debates center on mandatory KYC, policies for offshore stablecoins, and DeFi compatibility. In reality, <a href="https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzI0ODgzMDE5MA==&amp;mid=2247510734&amp;idx=1&amp;sn=368a5a6ed3d067ba05eacbb4be234dd7&amp;scene=21#wechat_redirect">the regulation’s essence is targeted control—not broad prohibition—for stablecoins issued or HKD-denominated in Hong Kong, especially RMB-related tokenized assets</a>. Offshore stablecoins like USDT, USDC, etc. remain largely unrestricted in secondary markets. The city’s strategy is clear: hold tight control over issuance and apply rigorous compliance to high-value scenarios such as RMB tokenization and offshore RMB stablecoins, establishing “quasi-sovereign settlement instruments” and differentiating from the US- and EU-driven models.</p> <p>Transparency and full-chain oversight are the ordinance’s keywords. Strict standards span the entire stablecoin lifecycle—from issuance, custody, and clearing to distribution—with steep licensing requirements. Downstream custody, distribution, and clearing providers must also meet compliance. Banks, payment services, and blockchain infrastructure firms are unified in a single framework, with the market moving from “open access” to “permissioned access.” MPC wallet, compliance, and risk control technology providers will become the primary partners for banks and tech firms alike.</p> <p>This regulatory rigor brings new challenges. Issuers are now fully responsible for downstream compliance—including custody, distribution, clearing, and other third parties. Any new entrant must meet both technical and organizational requirements, pushing the sector toward professionalization and giving infrastructure providers massive new opportunities. For example, technology vendors providing multi-signature, MPC, HSM, and related mechanisms—especially MPC wallets—will help issuers make private key security a foundation of trust, balancing asset sovereignty and legal traceability. Wallets now serve as critical entry points for compliance and security architectures, rather than merely back-end tools.</p> <h2 id="h2-5biC5Zy66YeH55So">Market Adoption</h2><h3 id="h3-8J+MseaRqeagueWkp+mAmu+8mkRlRmkg5ZKM6LWE5Lqn6YCa6K+B5YyW5aKe6ZW/44CM5LuN5Luk5Lq65aSx5pyb44CN">JPMorgan: “DeFi & Tokenization Growth Still Disappointing”</h3><h3 id="h3-6KaB54K56YCf6KeI">Highlights</h3><ul> <li>DeFi total value locked (TVL) has not yet returned to 2021 highs; primary players are still retail and crypto-native firms, with minimal traditional institutional activity.</li><li>Tokenized global assets total only about $25 billion—analysts call this “insignificant.” Of 60+ tokenized bonds, combined value is just $8 billion; secondary market trading is nearly zero.</li><li>Institutions face three hurdles: lack of cross-border regulatory alignment, ambiguous legal status for on-chain investing, and insufficient smart contract/protocol safety guarantees.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>The report shows a major gap between DeFi/tokenization hype and real-world use. Infrastructure is improving and KYC-compliant vaults and permissioned lending pools are emerging, but traditional finance remains cautious. The report notes the mainstream system is moving toward faster, cheaper settlements via fintech, which may diminish the need for blockchain rails—pushing crypto to deliver more convincing institutional-grade apps.</li></ul> <h3 id="h3-8J+MsSBSZW1pdGx5IOWQr+eUqOeos+WumuW4geaKgOacr+S8mOWMlui3qOWig+aUr+S7mOS4muWKoSDvvIzlsIbmjqjlh7rlpJrluIHnp43mlbDlrZfpkrHljIXmnI3liqE=">Remitly Deploys Stablecoin Tech to Optimize Cross-Border Payments; Multi-Currency Wallet Coming</h3><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>Remitly’s multi-currency “Remitly Wallet” launches September, supporting both fiat and stablecoin balances—targeted at users in high-inflation/volatile markets.</li><li>In partnership with Stripe’s Bridge, Remitly will offer stablecoin payout to users in over 170 countries, expanding beyond fiat rails.</li><li>Remitly now uses USDC and similar dollar stablecoins for internal treasury management, enabling 24/7 capital flows, reducing pre-funding, and increasing efficiency.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>This is the first large-scale use of stablecoin technology by a mainstream cross-border payments provider. Integrating stablecoins, Remitly offers both inflation-hedging for customers in unstable markets and liquidity solutions for remittance systems. Stablecoin adoption in real payments will advance, better serving hundreds of millions who depend on cross-border financial services, particularly in regions lacking traditional financial infrastructure.</li></ul> <h3 id="h3-8J+MsSBUZXRoZXIgQ0VP77yaNDAlIOWMuuWdl+mTvuaJi+e7rei0uea6kOiHqiBVU0RUIOi9rOi0pg==">Tether CEO: 40% of Blockchain Gas Fees Are USDT Transfers</h3><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino posted that 40% of all blockchain transaction fees (across 9 major chains) are for USDT transfers.</li><li>Hundreds of millions in emerging markets use USDT daily to hedge against local currency depreciation and inflation—making it one of the world’s most active blockchain apps.</li><li>In the context of crypto, “transactions” usually refer to trading, arbitrage, etc. on exchanges—not always requiring on-chain transfers. A USDT on-chain transfer (with fee) typically signals real movement between wallets—not mere speculation.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>USDT is now the dominant blockchain application, far ahead of other uses. Paolo predicts future competition in blockchain will center on gas fee optimization and USDT-related costs. Stablecoins have evolved from trading tools to real-world financial infrastructure, especially in volatile economies—demonstrating real progress in financial inclusion via crypto.</li></ul> <h2 id="h2-5a6P6KeC6LaL5Yq/8J+UrueRnuepl+mTtuihjO+8mkNvaW5iYXNlIFEyIOi0ouaKpeaYvuekuiBDaXJjbGUgVVNEQyDliKnmtqbnjofmraPlnKjokI7nvKk=">Macro Trends Mizuho: Circle USDC Profits Squeezed per Coinbase Q2 Earnings</h2><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>Mizuho analysts estimate Circle earned $625 million in Q2 interest from USDC reserves; $332.5 million of this went to Coinbase.</li><li>With Binance and other new partners joining, Circle’s net reserve margin faces growing cost pressure.</li><li>After the GENIUS Act, JPMorgan and Bank of America both plan to launch stablecoins, stoking USD stablecoin competition.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>Despite strong IPO performance, Mizuho keeps an “Underperform” rating and $85 target for Circle, warning markets underestimate USDC risk. As profit-sharing with Coinbase ends and distribution broadens, Circle’s profitability faces headwinds—especially as rates fall and banks pile in. This shift could reshape the stablecoin market.</li></ul> <h3 id="h3-8J+Urue+jui0ouaUv+mDqOWIm+e6quW9leaJqeWkp+efreacn+WbveWAuuWPkeihjO+8jOeos+WumuW4geaIkOaWsOS5sOWutg==">U.S. Treasury Bill Issuance Hits Record—Stablecoins a New Source of Demand</h3><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>The U.S. Treasury will auction $100 billion in 4-week T-bills—a record, up $5 billion from last round. 8- and 17-week bill sizes remain unchanged.</li><li>Short-dated yields >4% are fueling inflows—$16.7 billion entered T-bill ETFs in Q2, double YoY.</li><li>The Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee flagged rising stablecoin issuance as a new source of T-bill demand. The GENIUS Act obliges issuers to hold Treasuries as safe collateral.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>The Trump administration prefers short-term borrowing. Treasury Secretary Bessent says long-term issuance is too costly at current rates. Stablecoin demand is now a structural factor in T-bill markets, as regulation orders issuers to hold safe assets. Meanwhile, central banks are cutting USD reserves in favor of gold—BofA sees gold possibly breaking $4,000 as debt sustainability fears climb.</li></ul> <h3 id="h3-8J+UruOAikdFTklVUyDms5XmoYjjgIvpgJrov4fku6XmnaXmlLbnm4rlnovnqLPlrprluIHkvpvlupTmv4Dlop4=">Yield Stablecoin Supply Surges Post GENIUS Act</h3><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>Since July 18, supply of Ethena’s USDe yield stablecoin has grown 70% to $9.49 billion, now the #3 stablecoin by market cap.</li><li>Sky’s USDS grew 23% to $4.81 billion, ranking fourth. These coins yield through staking.</li><li>USDe yields 10.86% (annualized); USDS, 4.75%. After U.S. June inflation (2.7%), real yields are 8.16% and 2.05%.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>The GENIUS Act’s yield payment ban spawned a boom in stakable stablecoins. Investors are migrating to protocol-native yield, bypassing regulatory limitations. The stablecoin market has grown from $205 billion to $268 billion this year and may reach $300 billion by year-end. Despite tighter regulation, demand for high-yield USD substitutes stays strong—driving new DeFi innovation and adoption.</li></ul> <h2 id="h2-5paw5ZOB6YCf6YCS8J+RgOWJjeiLueaenOW3peeoi+W4iOaOqOWHuumakOengeS/neaKpOWKoOWvhiBWaXNhIOWNoSBQYXl5">Product Launches Ex-Apple Engineer Debuts Privacy-Focused Crypto Visa Card, Payy</h2><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>Payy Visa card uses ZKP and its proprietary blockchain to ensure user stablecoin transaction amounts remain private and are not publicly accessible on-chain.</li><li>Developed by ex-Apple iOS engineer Sid Gandhi at Polybase Labs over three years, ensuring both privacy and compliance.</li><li>Payy is user-focused, with frictionless onboarding and simple self-custody—even for blockchain novices.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>Payy solves two major crypto payment hurdles—privacy and usability. Regular blockchain payments reveal transaction history, but Payy preserves privacy within compliance. This enables daily self-custody stablecoin spending and presents a viable alternative to traditional banking.</li></ul> <h3 id="h3-8J+RgE1ldGFNYXNrIOaIluS4jiBTdHJpcGUg6K6h5YiS6IGU5ZCI5o6o5Ye656iz5a6a5biBIG1tVVNE">MetaMask May Partner with Stripe to Launch mmUSD Stablecoin</h3><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>Leaked Aave governance proposal suggests MetaMask and Stripe plan to launch the mmUSD dollar stablecoin, backed by M^0.</li><li>The proposal calls mmUSD MetaMask’s “cornerstone asset,” to be deeply integrated with all wallet/trading/yield functions.</li><li>The proposal was deleted; Aave Chan Initiative’s Marc Zeller confirmed authenticity but said release was premature.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>This is another tech giant (after PayPal, Robinhood) entering stablecoins. MetaMask teaming up with Stripe could speed up integration of stablecoins for both Web3 and traditional payments.</li></ul> <h3 id="h3-8J+RgENvaW5iYXNlIOaOqOWHuuW1jOWFpeW8j+mSseWMheW3peWFt+WMhe+8jOeugOWMluW8gOWPkeiAhSBXZWIzIOeUqOaIt+W8leWFpea1geeoiw==">Coinbase Launches Embedded Wallet SDK to Streamline Web3 User Onboarding</h3><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>Coinbase’s developer platform (CDP) adds Embedded Wallets SDK: lets developers add self-custody wallet features easily.</li><li>SDK includes crypto onramp, token swap, and USDC 4.1% yield. It aims to remove the tradeoff between UX and custody risk.</li><li>Unlike legacy wallets, users can sign in via email/SMS/OAuth—no browser plugin or seed phrase needed—facilitating fast and straightforward onboarding.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>Coinbase is lowering the barriers for Web3 app adoption by making wallet integration simpler and more secure. The SDK runs on Coinbase’s DEX-grade infra and is part of its “super app” strategy—positioning Coinbase as the essential bridge from Web2 to crypto.</li></ul> <h3 id="h3-8J+RgCDnvo7lm73mlbDlrZfpk7booYwgU2xhc2gg5o6o5Ye6IFN0cmlwZSBCcmlkZ2Ug5Y+R6KGM55qE56iz5a6a5biB77yM5pSv5oyB6Z2e576O5LyB5Lia6L275p2+5pS25LuYIFVTRCDlkoznqLPlrprluIE=">U.S. Digital Bank Slash Launches Stripe-Bridge Stablecoin: USDSL Offers Simple USD & Stablecoin Payments for International Businesses</h3><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>San Francisco digital bank Slash issues USDSL, a dollar stablecoin, via Stripe’s Bridge.</li><li>USDSL enables global dollar payments for businesses without a US bank account—cuts settlement time and FX fees.</li><li>The launch coincides with the GENIUS Act’s passage, which defines a US stablecoin regulatory regime.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>With regulatory clarity, fintechs are rapidly entering the stablecoin field. Slash’s Stripe-issued USDSL shows how traditional and crypto finance are converging to solve global payments—proving that with regulation, stablecoins are moving from concept to real-world business solutions.</li></ul> <h3 id="h3-8J+RgOeJueacl+aZruWFs+iBlOmhueebriBXb3JsZCBMaWJlcnR5IOaOqOWHuiBVU0QxIOeos+WumuW4geW/oOivmuW6puiuoeWIkg==">Trump-Aligned World Liberty Debuts USD1 Stablecoin Loyalty Program</h3><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>Backed by the Trump family, World Liberty Financial’s USD1 loyalty program launches with Gate and others, modeled after airline miles.</li><li>Earn points by trading USD1 pairs, holding, staking, using in DeFi, and engaging via the WLFI app.</li><li>USD1 stablecoin, launched in April, claims to be fully backed by short-term US Treasuries, USD deposits, and other cash equivalents—issued via BitGo Trust.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>With Trump and his sons as World Liberty ambassadors, potential conflicts-of-interest surface. Tying stablecoins and loyalty rewards together signals a new model for user retention amid fierce stablecoin competition—and reflects closer government-crypto sector ties.</li></ul> <h3 id="h3-8J+RgOaRqeagueWkp+mAmuaOqOWHuuWfuuS6jiBLaW5leHlzIOWMuuWdl+mTvueahOmTvuS4iuaXpeWGheWbnui0reino+WGs+aWueahiA==">JPMorgan Debuts On-Chain Intraday Repo on Kinexys Blockchain</h3><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>JPMorgan, HQLA-X, and Ownera launch cross-ledger repo: dealers swap funds/securities using Kinexys blockchain deposit accounts.</li><li>The platform covers all stages—from trade to collateral to settlement—down to the minute.</li><li>Can already handle $1 billion daily; built for scale with plans for more venues, assets, and digital cash tools.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>JPMorgan is setting a new standard for institutional blockchain adoption. Kinexys (ex-Onyx) anchors its digital asset strategy and could eventually underpin deposit tokens, stablecoins, and CBDCs—reducing market fragmentation. With the debut of JPMD (a JPMorgan stablecoin) and expanded Coinbase partnerships, Wall Street is moving past pilots into production blockchain applications.</li></ul> <h2 id="h2-55uR566h5ZCI6KeE8J+Pm++4j1BheG9zIOWboCBCaW5hbmNlIEJVU0Qg5ZCI5L2c5YWz57O76KKr57q957qm55uR566h5py65p6E572a5qy+IDQ4NTAg5LiH576O5YWD">Regulatory Compliance Paxos Fined $48.5M for Binance BUSD Partnership by NYDFS</h2><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>Paxos Trust will pay $26.5M in fines to NYDFS plus $22M for compliance upgrades.</li><li>Regulators found flaws: In 2018, during BUSD launch with Binance, Paxos failed due diligence on its partner and its anti-money laundering efforts.</li><li>Paxos accepted Binance’s claim of “fully restricting US users” without confirming independently; NYDFS halted BUSD issuance in 2023.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>This penalty shows that stablecoin issuer partnerships—especially offshore—face tough regulatory scrutiny. Paxos says it fixed these issues years ago, but the case sends a warning: issuers must conduct robust due diligence and build strong compliance. As the GENIUS Act takes effect and the stablecoin sector scales, regulatory risk for issuer-exchange partnerships is set to rise.</li></ul> <h3 id="h3-8J+Pm++4j+eJueacl+aZruetvue9suihjOaUv+WRveS7pO+8jOWBnOatoumTtuihjOWvueWKoOWvhui0p+W4geS8geS4mueahOOAjOS4jeWFrOW5s+ihjOS4uuOAjQ==">Trump Executive Order Ends Banks’ Unfair Practices Against Crypto Companies</h3><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>President Trump’s executive order bars federal agencies from penalizing banks that serve crypto firms based on “reputational risk.”</li><li>The order ends “Operation Choke Point 2.0,” blocking denials based on politics or “high-risk” labeling.</li><li>The Fed, OCC, and FDIC now vow not to consider “reputation” in customer vetting. Top lawmakers support the shift.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>This directive removes a key lever from regulators, forcing banks to make decisions based on legal and financial—rather than reputational—risk. It establishes crypto’s legal status and ensures equal access to banking, paving the way for deeper traditional-crypto integration as regulatory reforms continue.</li></ul> <p>Capital Moves</p> <p>Tether Acquires EU MiCA-Licensed Exchange Bit2Me, Leads $32.7M Funding</p> <p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>Tether has bought a minority stake in Spain’s Bit2Me and is leading a $32.7M (€30M) round set to close soon.</li><li>Bit2Me is the first Spanish-language exchange with an official MiCA license—authorized to operate across 27 EU states.</li><li>The investment funds Bit2Me’s expansion in Europe and Latin America (starting with Argentina). Founded 2014; serves 1.2 million users.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>Tether’s deal is a strategic push to secure access to Europe as MiCA rules tighten. As several exchanges deprioritize USDT, Tether’s investment builds new compliant markets for its stablecoin—demonstrating the power of its $4.9B quarterly profit for global expansion.</li></ul> <h3 id="h3-8J+SsFJpcHBsZSDlsIbmlqXotYQgMiDkur/nvo7lhYPmlLbotK3nqLPlrprluIHmlK/ku5jlubPlj7AgUmFpbA==">Ripple to Buy Stablecoin Payment Platform Rail for $200M</h3><p>Highlights</p> <ul> <li>Ripple will acquire Rail for $200M, deal to close Q4 2025.</li><li>Rail is projected to power 10%+ of global stablecoin payments ($3.6B market) next year.</li><li>The deal lets Ripple deliver enterprise-grade stablecoin payments (RLUSD, XRP, others) with fiat on/offramps—no crypto custody needed for clients.</li></ul> <p>Why This Matters</p> <ul> <li>Ripple’s second major buy this year (after April’s $1.25B Hidden Road deal) marks its rapid stablecoin market expansion. With active MiCA licensing in the EU and RLUSD cleared in Dubai, Ripple is building a global stablecoin platform—shifting from cross-border specialist to full-service finance player as institutional competition intensifies.</li></ul> <h3 id="h3-5aOw5piO77ya">Disclaimer:</h3><ol> <li>This article is sourced from [<a href="https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/9eK_y7Hteu4QC2Af4zlPMA">Cobo</a>], original title: "Cobo Stablecoin Weekly No.19: After the Stablecoin Act Passes, Where Is the Next “Battleground”?". Copyright belongs to the original author [<em>Cobo</em>]. If you have concerns about republication, please contact the <a href="[https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/3967](https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/3967">Gate Learn Team</a> for assistance.</li><li>Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely the author’s and do not constitute investment advice.</li><li>The Gate Learn Team translated other language versions. Reproduction, distribution, or translation is strictly prohibited unless Gate.com is properly cited.</li></ol>

2025-08-13

A Review of How I Profited from the Venus THE Attack

Venus Protocol, a leading lending protocol on BNB Chain, was hit by a classic Mango Markets-style price manipulation attack. The attacker targeted the low-liquidity asset THE, leveraging recursive borrowing, oracle manipulation, and a “donation attack” to bypass supply caps and artificially push the price above $0.60, extracting around $27 million in assets. In this article, Weilin Li offers an in-depth analysis of the attack mechanics and details how he identified the severe mismatch between the nominal value and liquidity of collateral, ultimately earning $15,000 through a precise short position on THE.

2026-03-17

LI Auto (LI) FAQ

What's the stock price of LI Auto (LI) today?

x
LI Auto (LI) is currently trading at $18,23, with a 24h change of -%2,98. The 52-week trading range is $15,71–$32,02.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for LI Auto (LI)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of LI Auto (LI)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of LI Auto (LI)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for LI Auto (LI)?

x

Should you buy or sell LI Auto (LI) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of LI Auto (LI)?

x

How to buy LI Auto (LI) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

Hot Posts About LI Auto (LI)

GateUser-bd883c58

GateUser-bd883c58

10 hours ago
Ask AI · How GLM-5's Technological Breakthroughs Are Reshaping Industry Pricing Logic? The coming-of-age ceremony for commercializing large models in the industry. Original by New Vision · Author | Li Xiaodong On March 31, 2026, Zhiyu AI, the “First Stock in Large Models” that listed on Hong Kong Stock Exchange less than three months ago, released its first annual performance report since going public. But for the domestic large model industry, the significance of this financial report goes far beyond the annual business review of a single listed company. From the frenzy of the 2023 Hundred-Model Battle, to the price war and internal competition in 2024, and then to the industry’s rational shift toward commercial implementation in 2025, over three years, the market’s evaluation criteria for large model companies have shifted from “Can they build models” to “Can they build sustainable businesses.” And this annual report from Zhiyu is a representative sample at this industry turning point. In the past two years, market perception of Zhiyu has always been tied to a few fixed labels: a tech-driven startup backed by Tsinghua University, a large model vendor maintaining revenue through privatization projects, and an AI concept stock burning money for growth. However, this financial report, along with Zhiyu’s series of actions in technological iteration and business strategy before and after its release, is prompting the market to reassess the true nature of this company and its position in the domestic AI large model landscape. 01 **Structural Changes:** **From Project-Based to Standardized Transformation** Let’s first look at the core operational data. In 2025, Zhiyu achieved a total revenue of 724 million yuan, a year-on-year increase of 131.9%; gross profit of 297 million yuan, up 68.7%; and an adjusted net loss of 3.18B yuan, expanding by 29.1% year-on-year. Focusing solely on revenue growth rate, this performance has already outpaced the 30% overall growth of China’s core AI industry in 2025. Even in the MaaS track with a 421.2% YoY increase, Zhiyu remains in the top tier. But what’s truly worth attention is not just the doubling of total revenue, but the fundamental change in revenue structure. This change essentially reflects a bottom-line shift in Zhiyu’s business logic. Breaking down by deployment mode, in 2025, Zhiyu’s localized deployment business revenue was 530 million yuan, up 102.3% year-on-year, accounting for 73.7% of total revenue, down from 84.5% in 2024; cloud deployment service revenue was 190.4 million yuan, a surge of 292.6%, accounting for 26.3% of total revenue, up from 15.5%. By product line, revenue from enterprise general large models and open platform/API saw significant YoY growth; enterprise intelligent agent business revenue reached 166 million yuan, up 248.8%. This set of data clearly illustrates the direction of Zhiyu’s revenue structure transformation: the localized deployment projects that once supported the company’s core are now lagging behind the growth of cloud-based standardized services; API-driven MaaS business and enterprise intelligent agents targeting complex scenarios are becoming new growth engines. Behind this structural change is a switch in Zhiyu’s business logic. Early on, like most domestic large model startups, Zhiyu’s revenue mainly came from privatization projects for central and state-owned enterprises and large corporations. These projects had high per-client prices and stable income, but also obvious shortcomings: project-based delivery required substantial customization and operational resources, difficult to scale, and highly dependent on clients. The growth of cloud API business indicates that Zhiyu’s revenue source is shifting from one-time project delivery to sustainable, standardized model capability calls. This is evidenced by the operational data of the MaaS platform: as of March 2026, Zhiyu’s MaaS API platform’s annual recurring revenue (ARR) reached 1.7 billion yuan, a 60-fold increase over the past 12 months; platform users exceeded 4 million, with 242k paying developers. Along with the change in revenue structure, gross profit margins have diverged. In 2025, the gross margin of Zhiyu’s cloud deployment business jumped from 3.3% in 2024 to 18.9%, gross profit increased from 1.6 million to 36 million yuan, a 2,150% increase; meanwhile, the gross margin of localized deployment dropped sharply from 66.0% in 2024 to 48.8% in 2025. The financial report explains that the decline in gross margin for localized deployment was mainly due to increased delivery resources to meet customer needs; the significant improvement in cloud gross margin was driven by efficiency gains from model inference and scale expansion of computing power, along with product price increases at the end of 2025 and early 2026. The profitability of cloud services has now entered an upward trajectory. However, behind rapid growth, Zhiyu still faces the industry-wide “revenue growth but profit stagnation” dilemma. In 2025, Zhiyu’s R&D expenditure reached 3.18 billion yuan, up 44.9%, accounting for 439% of total annual revenue. This massive R&D investment is the core reason for the company’s net loss expanding to 242k yuan. Looking at the allocation of R&D spending, it mainly falls into two parts: one is employee costs and equity compensation for R&D teams; the other is payments to third-party compute resource providers. This is a common cost pressure faced by all domestic large model vendors—whether for continuous iteration of foundational models or inference efficiency optimization, sustained investment in computing power and talent is essential. By the end of 2025, Zhiyu held over 2.2 billion yuan in cash and cash equivalents. How to maintain technological investment while improving profitability will be a key challenge moving forward. 02 **How the Upper Limit of Intelligence Translates into Market Discourse Power** If revenue structure change signifies a business model transformation, then the core confidence behind this shift comes from technological iteration that enhances model capabilities. The most tangible reflection of this is Zhiyu’s strategic decision to raise prices against the industry price war in early 2026. On February 12, 2026, Zhiyu announced its new flagship base model GLM-5, marking its first major model iteration since going public. Just over a month later, this technological achievement was directly reflected in commercial actions: Zhiyu raised API prices twice, with a total increase of 83%, and programming package prices by 30%. In the past two years, price wars in China’s large model industry have been characterized by price cuts, free offerings, and subsidies. Even leading companies like ByteDance’s Doubao and Alibaba Cloud’s Tongyi Qianwen have sharply reduced API prices to compete for market share. Zhiyu’s contrarian price increase was particularly notable in this environment. More interestingly, after the price hike, Zhiyu’s API call volume did not decline but instead showed signs of being in short supply. Financial data shows that after the price increase, GLM model calls grew by 400%. This counterintuitive performance has prompted the market to reconsider the competitive logic of the large model industry: when model capabilities diverge significantly, customer price sensitivity gives way to demand for effectiveness. According to official disclosures, on the technical architecture side, GLM-5 integrated DeepSeek’s sparse attention mechanism for the first time, reducing long-text processing costs by 50% while maintaining performance; it also introduced a new “Slime” asynchronous reinforcement learning framework, solving the logical decay problem in long-term agent execution and improving the efficiency of complex reinforcement learning tasks. This technological enhancement directly translates into competitive advantages in commercial scenarios. Within 24 hours of GLM-5’s release, it was officially adopted by top platforms including ByteDance’s TRAE/Coze, Alibaba’s Qoder, Tencent’s CodeBuddy, Meituan’s CatPaw, Kuaishou’s Wanquing, Baidu Cloud, and WPS Office. The financial report reveals that nine of China’s top ten internet companies are using GLM models. An interesting phenomenon is that almost all these internet giants with access to GLM models also have their own self-developed large models. Their choice to adopt Zhiyu’s models alongside their own is primarily because, in specific scenarios, GLM-5’s capabilities offer differentiated advantages. Beyond the internet industry, Zhiyu’s models are also penetrating traditional sectors like finance, manufacturing, and energy. This confirms Zhiyu’s core strategy of “Intelligent Upper Limit × Token Consumption Scale” as stated in the financial report. In the early stage of the large model industry, competition centered on parameter scale and leaderboard rankings; as the industry moves toward commercialization, the “intelligent upper limit”—the ability to solve complex problems in real production scenarios—becomes the core determinant of market discourse power. In March this year, a wave of collective price increases swept China’s large model industry. Tencent Cloud announced a price hike for its core Mengtian series models; shortly after, Alibaba Cloud and Baidu Cloud also raised prices for AI compute-related products and services. This industry-wide price increase indirectly confirms Zhiyu’s previous judgment: as large models evolve from toys to productivity tools, customers are willing to pay for genuinely effective capabilities, shifting industry competition from price wars to value wars. 03 **Reconstructing Industry Landscape: Zhiyu’s Position and Choices** In just two years since the Hundred-Model Battle, the landscape of China’s large model industry has undergone a fundamental change. According to China Academy of Information and Communications Technology (CAICT), at its peak, over 200 companies in China launched large model products. By the end of 2025, the number of vendors capable of sustained R&D investment, possessing independent controllable computing resources, and establishing a sustainable business logic has shrunk rapidly to fewer than 10 core players. The current domestic large model market has formed a clear competitive hierarchy. The first tier includes internet giants with full-stack capabilities—Baidu, Alibaba, Tencent, ByteDance—who have their own foundational models, large-scale scenarios, traffic portals, and control over computing and cloud services. According to IDC data, in the first half of 2025, China’s public cloud large model token calls reached 536.7 trillion tokens, with ByteDance’s Volcano Engine leading market share, followed by Alibaba Cloud and Baidu Cloud. The second tier consists of startups like Zhiyu, MiniMax, and Moonshade, which focus on foundational model R&D, mainly commercializing through API services and privatization deployments. They have differentiated technological advantages but lag behind in scenarios, traffic, and computing resources compared to the giants. In this landscape, external opinions suggest Zhiyu is following a path similar to overseas Anthropic: building a core barrier around base model capabilities, mainly offering API tokens, and developing an ecosystem through deep engagement with developers and enterprise clients, rather than competing head-on with giants in C-end traffic portals. As a company incubated by Tsinghua’s technical team, Zhiyu is among the earliest domestic teams to invest in large model R&D. However, unlike internet giants, Zhiyu lacks a self-owned C-end traffic portal and mature cloud sales channels. Competing directly with giants in the C-end chatbot space would be difficult to gain advantage. Instead, focusing on core base model capabilities and providing API outputs to developers, SMEs, and large internet firms with model needs allows Zhiyu to carve out its own niche. From the current financial data, this strategy has shown initial success. However, this path also faces challenges. On one hand, the rapid iteration of self-developed models by internet giants means their external model needs are mainly supplementary, not entirely dependent. Once their in-house models catch up in specific scenarios, customer loss is a risk. On the other hand, the development speed of domestic open-source large models is accelerating. Open-source models like DeepSeek are approaching the capabilities of closed-source models, significantly lowering the threshold for SMEs to use large models, which could impact Zhiyu’s API business. Additionally, Zhiyu must contend with competition from other startups in the same tier. For example, MiniMax, also listed in Hong Kong, launched its C-end products earlier. Startups like Moonshade and Baichuan Intelligence have also developed their own specialties in long context and vertical industry scenarios, making the market highly competitive. This first annual report after listing is more like a coming-of-age ceremony for Zhiyu’s commercialization. Previously, market perception was more focused on “strong technology but questionable commercialization”; now, the financial report and subsequent actions demonstrate the company’s maturity in business. From the industry’s perspective, Zhiyu’s development path offers a reference model for domestic large model startups. Historically, doubts about domestic large model startups centered on their dependence on privatization projects and inability to establish standardized, scalable business models—risking becoming just traditional software outsourcing firms. Zhiyu’s revenue structure change and rapid growth of cloud API business prove that, in a market dominated by internet giants, startups can differentiate through core technology and find their niche. Of course, challenges remain: the high R&D costs and losses, customer concentration risks, and competition from internet giants and open-source models are issues to address. In 2025, China’s large model industry has completed the shift from “Can we build it” to “Can we make it usable.” According to CAICT, the total token calls for large models on China’s public cloud providers grew 16-fold in 2025, exceeding 2 quadrillion tokens. Behind this data is the movement of large models from labs into real-world production across various industries, becoming true productivity tools. For a listed company, the market not only wants to see growth but also a clear path to profitability—something Zhiyu needs to demonstrate. — END —
0
0
0
0
CryptoWorld丽盈

CryptoWorld丽盈

15 hours ago
Crypto Circle Li Ying: April 16 Ethereum at 2336, how to position for the most stable long and short trades? Latest market analysis and operational suggestions Family! Ethereum is currently priced at 2336. In the 2-hour chart, the price strongly broke above the upper Bollinger Band at 2391 and stabilized, indicating a short-term bullish momentum explosion. The moving average system is arranged in a bullish configuration: MA(7) closely supports the current price as immediate support, MA(30) provides medium-term trend support, and MA(120) offers long-term trend support. The three lines are moving upward together and diverging, confirming that the medium-term upward trend is solid. The Bollinger Bands are widening, and the price is running along the upper band, indicating high trend strength. In the MACD indicator, DIF crosses above DEA; although the red histogram is small, it is positive—any negative reading here may be a display error, and it should be positive, indicating that bullish momentum, while slightly converging, still dominates. Trading volume significantly increased when breaking through 2330, with bullish funds actively entering. The technical structure is healthy, and the trend is likely to continue. From a momentum perspective, RSI is near 62, close to overbought but not in extreme territory. The KDJ indicator is running above 75, showing short-term strength but warning of potential pullback risk. The upper Bollinger Band at 2391 is a strong resistance; if the price breaks through this level with volume, it opens up upward space targeting 2450-2500. The key support below is at MA(7) as immediate support, MA(30) as medium-term support, and stronger support at MA(120). The current price at 2336 is in a consolidation phase after the breakout. If it pulls back and stabilizes in the 2326-2310 range with bullish candles and the MACD green histogram shortens, it’s a good opportunity to add to long positions. If it falls below 2310 with volume, caution is needed for a trend correction. Short-term practical strategy (Li Ying’s expert guidance, precise market alignment) Long position idea: Stand firm at 2320-2300, try long, stop loss at 2260, target 2350 aiming for 2450 Short position idea: Rebound at 2390-2400, try short, stop loss at 2420, target 2350 aiming for 2320 The market will always reward those who respect the trend and strictly follow the rules! Note: The above analysis is based solely on technical logic by Li Ying and does not constitute investment advice. The market carries risks; invest cautiously. #高盛申请比特币收益型ETF $ETH
0
0
0
0