C

Citigroup Price

Closed
C
$131,69
+$2,11(+%1,62)

*Data last updated: 2026-04-16 06:25 (UTC+8)

As of 2026-04-16 06:25, Citigroup (C) is priced at $131,69, with a total market cap of $230,31B, a P/E ratio of 14,88, and a dividend yield of %0,91. Today, the stock price fluctuated between $130,62 and $132,86. The current price is %0,81 above the day's low and %0,88 below the day's high, with a trading volume of 11,76M. Over the past 52 weeks, C has traded between $67,89 to $132,86, and the current price is -%0,88 away from the 52-week high.

C Key Stats

Yesterday's Close$129,58
Market Cap$230,31B
Volume11,76M
P/E Ratio14,88
Dividend Yield (TTM)%0,91
Dividend Amount$0,60
Diluted EPS (TTM)7,83
Net Income (FY)$14,26B
Revenue (FY)$168,30B
Earnings Date2026-07-14
EPS Estimate2,61
Revenue Estimate$23,09B
Shares Outstanding1,77B
Beta (1Y)1.0849334
Ex-Dividend Date2026-05-04
Dividend Payment Date2026-05-22

About C

Citigroup Inc., a diversified financial services holding company, provides various financial products and services to consumers, corporations, governments, and institutions in North America, Latin America, Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The company operates in two segments, Global Consumer Banking (GCB) and Institutional Clients Group (ICG). The GCB segment offers traditional banking services to retail customers through retail banking, Citi-branded cards, and Citi retail services. It also provides various banking, credit card, lending, and investment services through a network of local branches, offices, and electronic delivery systems. The ICG segment offers wholesale banking products and services, including fixed income and equity sales and trading, foreign exchange, prime brokerage, derivative, equity and fixed income research, corporate lending, investment banking and advisory, private banking, cash management, trade finance, and securities services to corporate, institutional, public sector, and high-net-worth clients. As of December 31, 2020, it operated 2,303 branches primarily in the United States, Mexico, and Asia. Citigroup Inc. was founded in 1812 and is headquartered in New York, New York.
SectorFinancial Services
IndustryBanks - Diversified
CEOJane Nind Fraser
HeadquartersNew York City,NY,US
Employees (FY)226,00K
Average Revenue (1Y)$744,69K
Net Income per Employee$63,13K

Learn More about Citigroup (C)

Citigroup (C) FAQ

What's the stock price of Citigroup (C) today?

x
Citigroup (C) is currently trading at $131,69, with a 24h change of +%1,62. The 52-week trading range is $67,89–$132,86.

What are the 52-week high and low prices for Citigroup (C)?

x

What is the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of Citigroup (C)? What does it indicate?

x

What is the market cap of Citigroup (C)?

x

What is the most recent quarterly earnings per share (EPS) for Citigroup (C)?

x

Should you buy or sell Citigroup (C) now?

x

What factors can affect the stock price of Citigroup (C)?

x

How to buy Citigroup (C) stock?

x

Risk Warning

The stock market involves a high level of risk and price volatility. The value of your investment may increase or decrease, and you may not recover the full amount invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Before making any investment decisions, you should carefully assess your investment experience, financial situation, investment objectives, and risk tolerance, and conduct your own research. Where appropriate, consult an independent financial adviser.

Disclaimer

The content on this page is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, financial advice, or trading recommendations. Gate shall not be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from such financial decisions. Further, take note that Gate may not be able to provide full service in certain markets and jurisdictions, including but not limited to the United States of America, Canada, Iran, and Cuba. For more information on Restricted Locations, please refer to the User Agreement.

Other Trading Markets

Citigroup (C) Latest News

2026-04-15 06:52

South Korean AI Startup Upstage Raises $120M, Becomes Country's First Generative AI Unicorn

Gate News message, April 15 — South Korean AI startup Upstage recently closed the first tranche of its Series C funding round at $120 million, bringing its total funding to approximately $270 million. The company said this makes it South Korea's first generative AI unicorn. Upstage plans to use the funds to develop its foundation models, expand operations in the U.S. and Japan, and hire additional staff. The round was driven by enterprise demand for Upstage's Solar LLM and Document Intelligence suite, which extracts and processes data from documents to reduce back-office costs. The Solar Pro model costs as little as $0.30 per million tokens, lowering processing costs compared to larger rivals. Clients such as Tricura Insurance Group reported application review times dropping from 30-60 minutes to under 10 minutes. Upstage reported over 130% year-over-year revenue growth and received support from Amazon, including AWS, and chipmaker AMD. The company's Solar Pro 2 model achieved top scores on Korean-language benchmarks, aligning with South Korea's push for AI sovereignty.

2026-04-15 01:02

South Korean AI Startup Upstage Becomes Country's First AI Unicorn with $130M Series C

Gate News message, April 15 — South Korean generative AI startup Upstage closed the first tranche of its Series C funding round, raising 180 billion won (approximately $130 million) and achieving a valuation exceeding 1 trillion won ($720 million), making it the country's first AI unicorn. Silicon Valley-based Sage Partners led the round. New investors include Exim Asia, Hyundai Motor, Kia, and Woori Venture Partners, alongside existing backers Premier Partners, Shinhan Venture Investment, Mirae Asset Venture Investment, KB Securities, and Intervest. The round brings Upstage's total funding to approximately 400 billion won since its 2020 founding, following seed, Series A (31.6 billion won in 2021), Series B (100 billion won in 2024), and Series B bridge (62 billion won in 2025) rounds. Upstage's proprietary large language model Solar LLM and document processing AI Document Parse are deployed by Fortune 500 companies including Samsung, major South Korean insurers, and multiple public institutions. The company reported annual revenue growth exceeding 130% and was selected by South Korea's Ministry of Science and ICT to lead the national independent foundation model project. The new capital will fund GPU infrastructure expansion, talent acquisition, overseas market development in the U.S. and Japan, and preparation for an initial public offering. CEO Kim Sung-hoon stated the company aims to achieve 1 trillion won in revenue, adding that the funding reflects market confidence in Upstage's position as South Korea's leading AI developer.

2026-04-09 17:17

ETH 15-minute pump of 0.71%: spot marginal buy pressure amplifies liquidity, pushing the short-term move higher

2026-04-09 17:00 to 2026-04-09 17:15 (UTC), the ETH price fluctuated within the range of 2207.09 to 2224.42 USDT, recording a positive return of +0.71% with a swing of 0.78%. The short-term rise has drawn market attention. Even though overall sentiment remains relatively cautious, volatility in the spot market has increased. The main driver of this abnormal move is that the spot market has seen incremental proactive buy orders amid a backdrop of contraction in derivatives and overall liquidity. As ETH perpetual contract open interest and trading volume both show a clear decline (24-hour trading volume is $105.88 million, down 46.46% day-over-day), the long/short ratio is about 1.05 and the funding rate is close to zero, with the leveraged market not showing any extreme directional behavior. On this basis, the impact of incremental proactive buying on the spot side has been amplified, directly pushing the price’s top end higher. At the same time, active addresses on-chain continue to trend downward (down from 620,000 over 90 days to 450,000, and down 1.2% over 48 hours). Stablecoin liquidity diversion has become clearly evident, with the increase in ETH market value far lower than USDT. Mainstream capital’s willingness to allocate to ETH remains relatively low. The Fear and Greed Index is 13, indicating that overall market sentiment is extremely cautious. The ETH/BTC relative performance continues to weaken, underperforming major assets. In addition, there are no direct macro disturbances yet such as the Fed or CPI, but adjustments in capital structure—such as funds and stablecoins—have amplified micro-level volatility in the spot market. At present, ETH liquidity is subdued, and changes in spot buying can easily amplify price volatility. If, going forward, the spot side sees large sell-offs, or if the derivatives market switches its directional positioning, there is a risk of a pullback and worsened volatility in the short term. It is important to focus on the ETH/BTC ratio, the flow of key on-chain funds, derivatives market positioning, and any sudden impacts from macro events. It is recommended to continue monitoring intraday anomalies and related indicators to guard against short-term trend reversals and liquidity risks.

2026-04-02 01:44

The U.S. Department of the Treasury issues the “GENIUS Act” state-level stablecoin regulation “substantially similar” judgment principles

Gate News message: On April 2, the U.S. Department of the Treasury issued broad principles under Section 4(c) of the “GENIUS Act” to determine whether state-level regulatory regimes are “substantially similar” to the federal regulatory framework. The core principles include: state-level regimes must meet or exceed the standards set forth in Section 4(a) of the “GENIUS Act”; for uniform requirements (reserve asset composition, redemption rights, monthly disclosures, BSA/sanctions compliance, etc.), state rules must be fully identical in substantive content to the federal framework; for state-adjustable requirements (capital, liquidity, reserve diversification, interest rate risk management, etc.), state rules may be tailored to local conditions, but the final regulatory outcome must be at least as strict and protective as the federal framework; states may add additional requirements, but they may not conflict with federal law and must not reduce overall similarity. The rule applies to state-qualified payment stablecoin issuers with an issuance volume of no more than $10 billion, allowing them to choose state regulation, while issuers with an issuance volume exceeding $10 billion must transition to federal regulation.

2026-04-01 01:42

Ark Invest increased its stake in OpenAI C-round shares by 349,000 shares and in CoreWeave shares by 26,500 shares yesterday

Gate News message, on April 1, Ark Invest Tracker data shows that Cathie Wood’s Ark Invest increased its holdings yesterday (March 31) by 348,995 shares of OpenAI Group PBC Series C stock and 26,515 shares of CoreWeave stock; the latter is worth about $2.05 million. OpenAI Group PBC is OpenAI’s operating entity.

Hot Posts About Citigroup (C)

Falcon_Official

Falcon_Official

3 minutes ago
#Gate13周年 TRUMP VS THE FED THE SHOWDOWN WALL STREET FEARED A Constitutional Crisis Hidden Inside an Economic Debate THE ULTIMATUM IN TRUMP'S OWN WORDS On April 15, 2026, in an interview on Fox Business with "Mornings with Maria," President Donald Trump issued his clearest threat yet against Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell: "I'll have to fire him, okay, if he's not leaving on time. I've held back firing him. I've wanted to fire him, but I hate to be controversial. I want to be uncontroversial. But he will be fired." Three sentences. Enormous market implications. THE CONTEXT — WHY THIS MATTERS SO MUCH RIGHT NOW Jerome Powell's term as Federal Reserve Chair expires on **May 15, 2026** approximately 30 days from the date of Trump's statement. Under normal circumstances, that would simply mean Powell leaves, Trump's nominated replacement Kevin Warsh takes over, and the transition proceeds through Senate confirmation. But circumstances in April 2026 are not normal. THE THREE PRESSURE POINTS MAKING THIS EXPLOSIVE 01 — THE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION Federal prosecutors are actively investigating cost overruns in the renovation of the Federal Reserve's headquarters building. Powell has stated publicly that he will not step down from his position not just as Chair, but from the Fed's governing board entirely until the Justice Department resolves this probe. Powell's board seat extends to **2028**, meaning even after his Chairmanship ends on May 15, he could legally remain as a Fed Governor. Trump's statement did not merely threaten to prevent Powell from staying as Chair it doubled down on the criminal investigation, making clear the administration has no intention of halting prosecutorial pressure on the central bank. 02 — THE WARSH NOMINATION PROBLEM Trump's chosen replacement, Kevin Warsh, requires Senate confirmation. That confirmation process was already reported as "shaky" heading into April 2026, with mounting scrutiny from Senate members over the administration's approach to the Fed and the ongoing criminal investigation. If Warsh's confirmation is delayed, Powell could remain as Chair past May 15 precisely the scenario Trump said would trigger a firing. 03 — THE INTEREST RATE BATTLE At the core of Trump's frustration with Powell is a dispute that has defined their relationship since Trump returned to office in January 2025: interest rates. Trump has repeatedly demanded Powell lower rates. Powell and the Fed's economists have maintained a cautious, data-driven approach that has kept rates higher than Trump prefers. Trump stated again on April 15 that Powell is doing a "bad job" and "should be lowering interest rates." THE LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL DIMENSION The question of whether a U.S. President can legally fire a Federal Reserve Chair is not fully settled law and markets know it. The Federal Reserve Act specifies that Fed governors serve fixed terms and can only be removed "for cause." Whether policy disagreement such as refusing to cut interest rates on presidential request constitutes legal "cause" for removal has never been definitively tested in court. If Trump attempts to fire Powell and Powell contests it, the resulting legal battle would create an unprecedented crisis of institutional independence for the world's most important central bank. Markets globally would face an uncertainty premium unlike anything since 2008. MARKET IMPACT — WHAT INVESTORS ARE WATCHING Fed Chair Term Expiry → May 15, 2026 Powell Board Seat (if he stays) → Until 2028 Warsh Senate Confirmation Status → Shaky / Under scrutiny Trump's Stated Position → "He will be fired" Powell's Stated Position → Not stepping down during probe Interest Rate Dispute → Ongoing since Jan 2025 Key Investor Concern → Fed independence erosion NY Times DealBook noted on April 15 that "just as war jitters are beginning to subside in the markets, investors are bracing for new uncertainty over leadership of the Fed." The S&P 500 had just broken 7,000 for the first time a record driven partly by ceasefire optimism in the U.S.-Iran conflict. That same day, the Fed leadership crisis re-entered the headlines with full force, creating a counterweight to equity optimism. CRYPTO MARKET ANGLE The Fed Chair standoff is directly relevant to crypto investors for two reasons: **Rate Expectations**: If Trump successfully pressures a new Fed leadership toward rate cuts whether through replacing Powell or appointing a more accommodative Chair the resulting liquidity expansion would be broadly constructive for risk assets including crypto. Lower rates reduce the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and historically correlate with BTC outperformance. **Dollar & Institutional Trust**: Conversely, if the firing of a Fed Chair erodes confidence in U.S. monetary institutions, the resulting dollar volatility could create short-term turbulence across all asset classes, including crypto. Uncertainty about who controls U.S. monetary policy is not automatically bullish it is first volatile, then potentially bullish. WHAT HAPPENS NEXT Four possible paths: PATH A → Powell exits May 15, Warsh confirmed, smooth transition PATH B → Powell stays as Governor post-May 15, Trump fires him PATH C → Senate delays Warsh, Trump extends ceasefire deadline PATH D → Legal challenge — Powell contests firing in federal court Path D would be the most market-disruptive scenario and the one that would force the Supreme Court to define executive power over the Fed for the first time in modern history. HISTORICAL CONTEXT No sitting U.S. President has ever successfully fired a Federal Reserve Chair. The Fed's independence from direct executive control is considered a cornerstone of dollar credibility and U.S. financial stability. Investors in every asset class equities, bonds, commodities, and crypto are watching this situation with the understanding that its resolution will define macro conditions for the remainder of 2026. #CreatorCarvinal #TrumpUltimatumtoPowell
2
1
0
0
HighAmbition

HighAmbition

34 minutes ago
#TrumpUltimatumtoPowell Trump Ultimatum to Powell — A Monetary Power Shift, Liquidity Repricing Event, and Bitcoin’s Structural Moment Date: April 15–16, 2026 Bitcoin Price: ~$75,000 24H Change: +2.8% Cycle Position: Mid-cycle recovery → Pre-expansion phase Liquidity Regime: Neutral → Early expansion transition Volume Structure: Compression → Imminent expansion 1. This Is Bigger Than Politics — It Is a System-Level Event The confrontation between Donald Trump and Jerome Powell is not just political tension — it is a system-level stress event for the global financial architecture. At its core, this situation challenges the independence of the Federal Reserve — an institution that anchors global liquidity, interest rates, and risk pricing. If that independence is even partially compromised, markets do not simply react — they reprice everything simultaneously. This is why volatility is not random right now. It is anticipatory. 2. The Real Battle — Control Over Liquidity Cycles Strip away the headlines, and the situation becomes very clear: This is a battle over who controls the liquidity cycle Political side (Trump): Growth acceleration, lower rates, stronger markets Institutional side (Powell): Stability, inflation control, policy credibility Markets are not confused — they are calculating outcomes. Because liquidity is not just a variable It is the primary driver of every major asset trend 3. Bitcoin’s Position — Silent Strength Before Expansion Bitcoin trading at ~$75,000 is not just holding — it is absorbing macro pressure while maintaining structure Let’s break the structure properly: Cycle low (~$60K) → +25% recovery move Range breakout (~$68K) → +10% continuation Current zone (~$75K) → high liquidity compression This type of structure historically appears before: volatility expansion + directional breakout Not during weakness Not during distribution But during accumulation before expansion 4. Volume Behavior — The Most Underrated Signal Right Now Most traders are watching price Smart traders are watching volume Current volume tells a very specific story: No aggressive sell pressure No panic liquidation cascades Gradual increase in open interest Stable spot demand This is not exit behavior This is controlled accumulation under uncertainty Which typically leads to: explosive movement once clarity arrives 5. Liquidity Map — Where the Market Will Decide Direction Bitcoin is currently trading inside a structured liquidity framework: $72K–$73K: Strong demand absorption zone $75K–$76.5K: High-volume equilibrium (current battle zone) $80K: Major liquidity magnet (breakout trigger) $85K–$90K: Expansion targets $68K: Structural invalidation level Markets do not move randomly between these levels They move to capture liquidity And right now, liquidity is building on both sides Which means: a large move is approaching 6. Scenario Expansion — Full Macro + Price Modeling Scenario A — Controlled Transition (Gradual Bullish Expansion) If Powell exits without institutional disruption and policy shifts toward easing: Liquidity expands steadily Dollar weakens moderately Risk assets strengthen Bitcoin Outcome: Break above $80K → +6% to +10% Continuation toward $85K–$90K → +15% to +20% Volume confirms trend gradually → sustainable rally Scenario B — Aggressive Political Shift (Liquidity Shock Expansion) If Donald Trump forces a rapid shift and markets price aggressive easing: Liquidity spikes quickly Capital rotates aggressively into risk assets Bitcoin Outcome: Rapid breakout → $85K+ Momentum phase → +20% to +30% expansion Volume becomes explosive Momentum feeds momentum Scenario C — Institutional Shock (Short-Term Risk-Off)** If Jerome Powell is removed abruptly and markets panic: Liquidity temporarily contracts Risk assets sell off Bitcoin Outcome: Drop to $70K → -6% Extreme flush to $65K → -12% But here is the critical insight: This would likely be a temporary liquidity shock, not a structural reversal Because instability strengthens Bitcoin’s long-term narrative 7. Capital Flow Dynamics — Where Money Will Go Markets always follow capital flow If this situation weakens confidence in traditional systems: Capital rotates out of bonds Dollar faces pressure Alternative assets gain attention Bitcoin becomes attractive because: It is decentralized It is policy-independent It is globally accessible This is not speculation This is capital reallocation logic 8. Institutional Behavior — What Smart Money Is Quietly Doing While headlines dominate retail attention, institutions are focused on: Liquidity expectations Policy trajectory Risk-adjusted positioning Current signals show: No large distribution No systemic deleveraging Gradual positioning increase This is classic: pre-expansion accumulation phase 9. The Deeper Shift — Collapse of Clear Boundaries The most important takeaway is not about Powell or Trump individually It is about this: The line between political power and monetary policy is weakening And once that line weakens: Policy predictability declines Institutional trust erodes Volatility becomes structural And in such environments: Bitcoin thrives 10. Multi-Timeframe Outlook Short Term (Days) Volatility spikes likely Range: $72K – $78K Liquidity sweeps on both sides Medium Term (Weeks) Break above $80K → expansion phase Upside potential: +10% to +20% Extended Macro (Months) Liquidity expansion → strong bullish continuation Political pressure → strengthens BTC narrative Final Macro Conclusion This is not noise This is not temporary This is a liquidity regime transition in early stages Markets are not reacting yet — They are positioning And when positioning completes: Movement accelerates Final Insight — The Real Question The question is not whether Bitcoin will move The question is: Will liquidity expand gradually — or explosively? Because in both cases: Bitcoin does not stay still it reprices
3
2
0
1