Restricting stablecoin yield and rewards lacks any sound economic justification. The policy creates real damage across multiple fronts—it directly hurts consumers who lose access to competitive returns, weakens the US dollar's appeal in the digital economy, and raises national security concerns by ceding ground to offshore alternatives. Meanwhile, the primary beneficiary? Traditional banks defending their turf. By keeping stablecoin rewards suppressed, regulators shield deposit accounts offering near-zero interest from facing actual market competition. It's protectionism wrapped in policy language.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ForumMiningMastervip
· 2h ago
Here we go again? Basically, traditional finance is scared and trying to suppress stablecoin yields to protect their zero-interest bank deposits. It's really outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
ParanoiaKingvip
· 2h ago
Basically, it's the banking group causing trouble, afraid of being eliminated.
View OriginalReply0
Liquidated_Larryvip
· 2h ago
Traditional banks' move is truly brilliant, using policy rhetoric to implement protectionism, causing the dollar to bleed directly on the chain.
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Whisperervip
· 2h ago
The banking group is playing this trick again, really getting tired of it.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)