Recently, the starkly different choices made by two institutions in crypto asset allocation have sparked widespread market discussion. On one side is Bitmine Immersion Technologies, which continues to significantly increase its holdings and stake Ethereum; on the other side is Strategy, known for Bitcoin, which disclosed an unrealized loss of up to $17 billion. The gap between them is widening.
Bitmine recently disclosed that its Ethereum holdings have reached 4.14 million ETH, valued at approximately $13.2 billion, accounting for 3.43% of the total Ethereum supply. Of these, about 780,000 ETH have been staked and are generating stable income. The company’s management explicitly stated their goal to hold 5% of the total Ethereum supply in the future, viewing this strategy as a long-term core asset allocation. As U.S. policies toward the crypto industry become more friendly and the tokenization of stablecoins and real assets accelerates, Bitmine is highly optimistic about the growth prospects of the Ethereum ecosystem by 2026.
From an operational model perspective, Bitmine’s focus is not solely on betting on ETH price increases but on building a “yield-generating crypto asset balance sheet” through staking mechanisms. The company plans to launch its own validator network, which, once fully operational, could generate annualized staking income of hundreds of millions of dollars, providing a steady cash flow to cover operational costs, debt pressures, and potential dividends. This Ethereum staking yield model is seen as a more robust path for institutional participation in the crypto market.
In stark contrast is Strategy. While adhering to a “Bitcoin-centric” strategy, the company is under significant unrealized losses due to price corrections. In Q4 2025, Strategy recorded an unrealized loss of over $17 billion, with its stock price significantly retreating from its peak, and its market premium has noticeably shrunk. Despite holding a large amount of Bitcoin, since Bitcoin itself does not generate cash flow, the company can only rely on financing and reserves to meet its obligations.
Overall, Bitmine represents an Ethereum staking and yield-driven crypto asset management approach, while Strategy continues with a pure price appreciation-focused Bitcoin heavy position. As institutions accelerate their crypto asset allocations and pay more attention to sustainable cash flow and risk management, which model will have greater long-term competitiveness is becoming a core topic of market concern.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
2 Likes
Reward
2
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
小稳1哥
· 01-06 04:44
Follow #晒出我的持仓收益#'s signals. After this order ends, automatically follow the next one. Set the copy trading to full copy mode. Position control and profit curve remain effective; when the market moves, small positions can also grow over time. Re-hedging and re-hedging contracts, currently approaching 5x returns, with the total position nearly doubled in twenty days. Currently operating with 20% of the position.
Bitmine heavily stakes Ethereum, and Strategy is deeply in massive unrealized losses: How do the two crypto treasury strategies differ?
Recently, the starkly different choices made by two institutions in crypto asset allocation have sparked widespread market discussion. On one side is Bitmine Immersion Technologies, which continues to significantly increase its holdings and stake Ethereum; on the other side is Strategy, known for Bitcoin, which disclosed an unrealized loss of up to $17 billion. The gap between them is widening.
Bitmine recently disclosed that its Ethereum holdings have reached 4.14 million ETH, valued at approximately $13.2 billion, accounting for 3.43% of the total Ethereum supply. Of these, about 780,000 ETH have been staked and are generating stable income. The company’s management explicitly stated their goal to hold 5% of the total Ethereum supply in the future, viewing this strategy as a long-term core asset allocation. As U.S. policies toward the crypto industry become more friendly and the tokenization of stablecoins and real assets accelerates, Bitmine is highly optimistic about the growth prospects of the Ethereum ecosystem by 2026.
From an operational model perspective, Bitmine’s focus is not solely on betting on ETH price increases but on building a “yield-generating crypto asset balance sheet” through staking mechanisms. The company plans to launch its own validator network, which, once fully operational, could generate annualized staking income of hundreds of millions of dollars, providing a steady cash flow to cover operational costs, debt pressures, and potential dividends. This Ethereum staking yield model is seen as a more robust path for institutional participation in the crypto market.
In stark contrast is Strategy. While adhering to a “Bitcoin-centric” strategy, the company is under significant unrealized losses due to price corrections. In Q4 2025, Strategy recorded an unrealized loss of over $17 billion, with its stock price significantly retreating from its peak, and its market premium has noticeably shrunk. Despite holding a large amount of Bitcoin, since Bitcoin itself does not generate cash flow, the company can only rely on financing and reserves to meet its obligations.
Overall, Bitmine represents an Ethereum staking and yield-driven crypto asset management approach, while Strategy continues with a pure price appreciation-focused Bitcoin heavy position. As institutions accelerate their crypto asset allocations and pay more attention to sustainable cash flow and risk management, which model will have greater long-term competitiveness is becoming a core topic of market concern.