Powder foundation comparison: recently trying out various products, I’ve learned some things. Even within the same powder type, they can be so different.



If you prioritize long-lasting wear, the Synchrofit Pact EX shows less dryness and stickiness even after 8 hours. It also feels less powdery and gives a porcelain skin finish, which is impressive. However, since foundation coverage for spots only decreases by about 29%, you need to use a good primer or base.

If you prefer a semi-glossy skin look, the T'Poudre Éclat is also recommended. It feels smooth and doesn’t look powdery, but covers pores by about 39% and spots by around 33%, so it’s mainly suited for a natural look.

For those who want to prevent shine for a long time, the HD Skin Matte Velvet Compact is effective. Its particles are fine, with coverage of 63% for pores and 44% for spots. Many users also say it controls T-zone oiliness well.

If you like a lightweight feel, the Matte Smooth Mineral Foundation is a loose type, similar to face powder. However, because it’s light coverage, its coverage rate is about 50% and 22%.

If you’re budget-conscious, the Chifure UV Powder Foundation (715 yen) is surprisingly good. It’s less powdery and doesn’t break down easily over 8 hours. Of course, its coverage is modest.

The key to comparing foundations is understanding your skin type and what you prioritize. Long-lasting wear, coverage, lightness, hydration—there’s no perfect product for everything, so knowing your compromise points is the best way to choose wisely.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin