Recently, people keep asking, "Can on-chain privacy really hide things?" My current expectation is quite simple: the less you expose, the better, but don’t expect anonymity to mean no disturbance. To put it plainly, on-chain is like a glass ledger; privacy tools are more like drawing a curtain to block outsiders’ eyes, not moving the house away. When it comes to compliance, what needs to be seen can still be traced, just with different costs and thresholds.



And these days, that mainstream public chain is about to upgrade/maintain, and the community is guessing whether the ecosystem will migrate. I’m actually more concerned about: don’t switch chains or export private keys randomly during such periods, as that’s the easiest way to trip up beginners in times of anxiety. Use separate wallet addresses, regularly revoke permissions, and don’t treat "privacy" as a lucky escape… I won’t bother explaining further; just focus on doing the small actions you can do reliably.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin