Lately, I've been debating the wallet issue again: hardware wallets are indeed worry-free, suitable for those who "just leave it alone" with their positions, but if you're running cross-chain tasks every day, plugging and unplugging to confirm transactions repeatedly, you'll eventually find it troublesome... Multi-signature is more suitable for teams or large funds, with a stable process but high communication costs, don’t turn yourself into a work approval process. I quite like social recovery; losing your phone doesn’t mean you’re dead in the water, but only if you truly trust those few "people who will save you." Forget it, to put it plainly: don’t overcomplicate small amounts of money, the more complex it is, the easier it is to slip up; when the amount reaches a certain level, it’s better to go slow and use hardware + layered security, or even multi-signature. By the way, I’ve been noticing the recent NFT royalty disputes blowing up, which ultimately is about "who bears the friction costs," and wallets are the same. Anyway, my current principle is: the fewer signatures, the better; the fewer bridges, the better.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin