Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, I've seen a bunch of people treat LST+ staking as "compound returns," but honestly, the gains aren't coming out of nowhere: one layer is the basic reward you get for staking ETH with validators; the additional staking layer is more like renting out "security"—others use your collateral to support new services, paying you a rental fee/subsidy.
The risks are similarly not mysterious: the main concern at the basic layer is validator issues, penalties, and liquidity discounts; the extra layer of "someone else's problem"—you’re not involved in their operations, but if they have an accident or rules change, penalties could propagate to you. Recently, incentives on testnets and tokenomics expectations have been quite heated, with everyone speculating whether the mainnet will issue tokens... I personally care more about whether the protocol clearly states: who can toggle penalties, how to compensate if something goes wrong—so it doesn't end up being just points for uncertain outcomes. If I miss out, I miss out.