#代币空投与发放 Seeing Lighter's witch screening mechanism, I have to say this needs careful consideration. Using data science and clustering methods for anti-cheat detection sounds professional, but the key issue is—algorithm details are not disclosed, with the reason being fear of "targeted optimization." I've heard this logic too many times.

That said, they have established an appeal mechanism, and the number of appeals is lower than expected, which could indicate two situations: either everyone is being accurately screened, or many people are unaware that they have been labeled as witch accounts, or simply gave up. I tend to believe the latter. Another detail—large token transfers to trading platforms are unrelated to airdrops; this is to "protect investors and the team's distribution shares." This statement needs to be scrutinized; large liquidity movements are usually risk signals, and ongoing monitoring of subsequent fund flows is necessary.

Most importantly, they have abandoned the dual-token/equity structure, aiming to let value accumulate into the tokens. That sounds good, but don’t forget—fundamentals like token concentration, unlock schedules, and real-world use cases are things you need to handle yourself. Having an appeal mechanism is a good thing, but if you are wrongly judged, whether you can truly overturn the case remains a question. I suggest everyone focus on the project's fundamentals and not rely too much on airdrop expectations, as those are often the most unpredictable parts.