The development of comprehensive crypto market structure legislation in the United States requires coordinated efforts across two distinct Senate committees, each wielding significant oversight authority in the digital assets space.



The Banking Committee holds jurisdiction over the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and securities-related matters, while the Agriculture Committee oversees the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and commodities regulation. This bifurcated structure reflects the ongoing debate about how digital assets should be classified and regulated within the existing financial framework.

Because these committees operate under separate jurisdictions, they develop their own legislative proposals independently. This means each committee drafts its own bill text, creating a complex process where different regulatory approaches must eventually be reconciled. The result is often competing visions for how the crypto market should be structured—one committee emphasizing investor protection and securities law, the other focusing on market integrity and commodity supervision.

Understanding this committee structure is essential for anyone tracking proposed crypto regulations, as it explains why legislative progress can be fragmented and why industry stakeholders often need to engage with multiple regulatory frameworks simultaneously.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GweiWatchervip
· 3h ago
It's the same old process again, with the two committees bickering back and forth, and our crypto being caught in the middle, tightly controlled.
View OriginalReply0
ShamedApeSellervip
· 3h ago
The two committees are fighting. How can we come up with a decent crypto bill... --- It's the same old story, SEC still wants to block our profits. --- Basically, regulatory agencies haven't figured out how to classify cryptocurrencies, and we're just waiting as retail investors. --- This kind of "balance" is ultimately exploited by big capital, and retail investors are just pawns. --- Why can't one department make the decision? Why all this fuss? --- The industry has to comply with two sets of rules simultaneously, and it's really no wonder we're being exploited. --- So when will legislation finally be finalized? It feels like it's always being delayed. --- This is the price of American democracy, where everything has to be handled separately... Speechless.
View OriginalReply0
HashBanditvip
· 3h ago
ngl this bifurcated committee mess is exactly why we can't have nice things... back in my mining days the regulatory landscape was basically nonexistent and look where that got us lol. anyway the real question is whether either of these committees even understands the scalability trilemma or are we just gonna keep pretending bitcoin operates the same way as some commodity futures contract smh
Reply0
0xInsomniavip
· 3h ago
Is this another show where the two committees hinder each other... Can anything good really come out of it?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt