In the crypto market, early bets combined with enough confidence are the strongest weapons.



Do you remember last year when I made $45,000 from an initial investment of $1,500 in a certain blockchain game project? That project has now generated over $100 million in cumulative revenue, with an annualized income approaching $30 million. Honestly, few projects in the entire crypto ecosystem can match this achievement.

Often, the opportunity is right there, but most people either don't see it or lack the courage to act. Early awareness and long-term persistence—these two elements together are the key to wealth. The projects that ultimately succeed are often driven by the earliest supporters. You need to have the vision to identify potential projects and the patience to see them grow.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SmartContractDivervip
· 3h ago
1500 to 45000? Okay, I believe you. Anyway, I lost everything last year. Honestly, it's just good luck; I happened to be on the right boat. I've read too many articles like this; in the end, it's all survivor bias.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoGoldminevip
· 4h ago
A 1500 to 45,000 ROI looks exciting, but the key is to withstand the psychological test of the mid-term slump. Early cognition essentially reduces information delay, but the problem is that most people neither have information sources nor execution power. I remember when I was planning my mining rig layout, others were still debating GPU prices, but I had already calculated the reward-to-risk ratio for the difficulty adjustment cycle. Projects like these are indeed rare to come by; an annualized turnover of 30 million is truly exceptional within the entire ecosystem.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaBrainvip
· 4h ago
1500 to 45000? That data sounds a bit unbelievable, but indeed some people have made money. Early awareness in this area is spot on; the key is having the luck and vision. Opportunities are always there, but how many can truly go all-in and survive? Persistence is important, but what's even more heartbreaking is that most projects end up zeroed out, you know? I agree, but this is also the classic case of survivor bias.
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Observervip
· 4h ago
Let me look at the data... 1500 to 45000, the range is indeed impressive, but the real question is whether the sample size is sufficient. The true issue lies in survivor bias; stories of making money will always be far more common than stories of losing money.
View OriginalReply0
MeaninglessApevip
· 4h ago
1500 to 45000, man, that's just crazy. Why didn't I catch this train? Really? Every time I see a promising project, it ends up dying. Maybe I really just don't have the eye for it. Any chance I get, I want to take a gamble, but I just don't have the luck. You're right, early believers really made a fortune, and us later folks can only sip the soup. Could this be survivor bias again? The successful examples always boast the most.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt