From a reputation perspective, some projects' practices are quite good and indeed have the meaning of learning from leading projects. However, to be honest, I don't see any real utility in this approach.



The key issue lies here: firstly, this is essentially a token discount sale based on users' affordability, in other words, a price tiering. Looking at the NFT side, the pricing logic becomes even more tenuous. Think about it, if the price of NFTs entirely depends on individual purchasing power, how can this model work?

Don't talk about innovation; such a design makes it difficult to find a healthy market equilibrium. From both the user perspective and the project's sustainability perspective, there are obvious logical flaws.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
PumpAnalystvip
· 45m ago
It's the same old trick of cutting leeks again after seeing through it, daring to boast about innovation just by changing the skin. *** This is a typical trap set by the market makers. Price layering, in simple terms, is just a fancy name for scalp trading. *** The technical aspect has already collapsed. The NFT pricing logic is completely untenable. Risk control alerts, brothers. *** Another pseudo-innovative project. I can tell from the K-line how this scheme is going to die. *** Honestly, the project team's tactics are too obvious. Sustainability? Don't even dream about it. *** Support levels are gone. This design can't find a market equilibrium point at all. The trend is set. *** Everyone, pay attention. This is the last window for cutting leeks. Don't get on board.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWanderingPoetvip
· 6h ago
Basically, it's just a rebranded scam to fleece new investors, nothing new --- The tiered pricing model has been played out long ago, do they really think we can't see through it? --- NFT pricing entirely depends on purchasing power? How big does the logical loophole have to be to go live? --- Referencing top projects is just a nice way of saying copying and pasting --- Sustainability? Nonexistent. This kind of model will inevitably blow up someday --- I just want to ask, who would really pay for this scheme? --- To find a balance point, there must be real value first. Right now, it's all虚 --- Another pseudo-innovative project, next one
View OriginalReply0
0xLostKeyvip
· 6h ago
Basically, it's just a change of packaging without changing the medicine. The pricing tiering strategy has been a cliché for a long time. The NFT part is even more outrageous, completely based on personal preference. Where's the concept of a balance point?
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfastvip
· 6h ago
Basically, it's just a shell game to scam quick profits, nothing new. NFT pricing following wallet size? Isn't that just a blatant wealth tax? Price stratification has been played out for a long time, and they still dare to call it innovation. It's a miracle if this model can run; it will collapse sooner or later.
View OriginalReply0
StakeOrRegretvip
· 6h ago
Honestly, this is just a rebranded way to scam users; the layered pricing scheme is an old trick.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)