A recent article I came across is definitely worth pondering.



The traditional bull market script has completely failed after Bitcoin gradually became mainstream. Just look at the data — large-scale institutional deployment, the opening of traditional financial channels, the listing of payment companies, and political figures expressing support — these have all been high-beta signals in previous cycles. But what’s the result? Volatility has actually collapsed, and it’s become very cold.

Even more ironic is that BTC’s performance in 2025 has actually underperformed gold, the US stock market, and the A-share market — traditional assets. This is not just a simple market correction but a shift in the entire expectation framework. From high speculation to asset allocation, from retail-driven to institutional pricing, the underlying logic of the market is changing.
BTC1.67%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SleepyValidatorvip
· 5h ago
That's right, this is the price of mainstream adoption. When institutions come in, there's actually no movement, even more subdued than when retail investors were frantically piling in. Underperforming gold is really heartbreaking; it feels like the entire storyline needs to be rewritten. But on the other hand, stabilizing might not be a bad thing, saving us from heart attacks every day.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBarbecuevip
· 5h ago
Institutions entering the market actually didn't bring a rally; this situation really can't be sustained anymore. --- Wait, is BTC underperforming gold? This script is reversed. --- From gambling to asset allocation, our group of retail investors has truly become sacrificial pawns. --- Mainstream adoption works like this: the more people buy, the fewer people hype it up. Ironically. --- So, you're saying that when institutions come into the crypto space, it dies? --- Volatility collapse means there's no money to be made. Just hearing it makes me uncomfortable.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerPrivateKeyvip
· 5h ago
Huh? The institutions came and the volatility disappeared? That logic is indeed absurd. BTC still underperformed gold; it seems that mainstream adoption has actually killed its edge. Turning from gambling to asset allocation, it just doesn't sound exciting. Wait, that's not right. Thinking this way, institutions are truly in it for the long term.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapyvip
· 5h ago
Institutional entry is actually cooling off, which indicates that mainstream adoption is dead. The previous set of stimulating methods is gone.
View OriginalReply0
PumpBeforeRugvip
· 5h ago
This script twist is a bit intense, with institutions entering the market and actually cooling things down? It feels like BTC is really becoming boring. --- Losing to gold—what does that mean? Institutional pricing is just suppressing volatility; the era of retail frenzy is over. --- Ah, wait, shifting from speculative assets to asset allocation—that's the real mainstreaming, right? --- If this logic continues, are there still opportunities for a surge later? Or is stability the new normal? --- When institutions come in, they actually kill volatility—that's counterintuitive, but it makes sense when you think about it. --- Losing so much in 2025, no wonder everyone in the group is bearish. --- I need to ponder the idea of a shift in the expectation framework; it feels like that's the key.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyHashValuevip
· 5h ago
Haha, did the institutions come and then cool down? That logic is indeed counterintuitive. BTC has become a grandma's investment product, and the excitement is completely gone. Honestly, mainstreaming is just domestication. As the asset allocation attribute becomes stronger, the speculative nature weakens. This is inevitable. Losing to gold in performance is a bit painful... Feels like the gameplay has really changed.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-44a00d6cvip
· 5h ago
Honestly, I find this logic a bit hard to understand. When institutions enter the market, they actually cool down? So the previous hype was really true or false… BTC being pressed down by gold and the US stock market—whoever is involved would feel awkward… Mainstream adoption is a double-edged sword. When the profit-making effect disappears, it actually becomes more restrictive, which is a bit ironic. Institutional pricing means no more huge profits. Has the era of retail investors really passed? From speculation to allocation, it sounds high-end, but actually it's just the return being "regulated"… Is this a real cycle shift, or is the market just playing tricks on us?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)