Let's assume we shift our perspective to the year 2026. If Powell adopts a hardline stance and votes against all proposals (similar to the approach historically taken by Ackels), the situation could become quite complicated.

From a policy implementation perspective, this deadlock would directly impact the effectiveness of monetary policy. Uncertainty about policy expectations would significantly increase, triggering chain reactions in the crypto market, stock market, and bond market.

The real solution isn't about continuing to apply pressure. Both sides need to find an exit. One possible path is to reach a compromise through negotiation—such as making concessions on accountability or offering a symbolically honorable retirement. This could defuse the political deadlock and create space for new policy directions.

Historical experience shows that the stability of central bank leadership is crucial for market confidence. How to balance power checks and policy coherence will directly influence the economy in 2026 and beyond.