I've long suspected that this project has issues. When I observed it in October, I noticed data anomalies— tweets with only 32 likes but receiving 60,000 views, which is clearly an unreasonable ratio. Comparing it to the previous tweet, which only had about 300 views, such a huge fluctuation in data is worth being cautious about.



What exactly is driving this traffic discrepancy? Does the project's subsequent logic align with these abnormal data? To be honest, I can't provide a definitive answer. The market has too many variables. However, since I detected these irregularities early on, it's still necessary to flag it as a potential risk. Projects like this are often worth approaching with caution.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropF5Brovip
· 6h ago
The data is so outrageous, it must be bots spamming. I've seen through it long ago.
View OriginalReply0
0xInsomniavip
· 6h ago
The data is so outrageous, just bought traffic, obviously fake --- 32 likes, 60,000 views. I've seen this trick many times, it's a routine --- You still believe this kind of data? The market has long been chaotic --- Early detection of red flags is good. There are indeed many such projects --- Traffic and engagement are seriously mismatched, it's a scam --- A typical pump-and-dump coin operation, remember this trick --- I've also encountered similar cases, it's really suspicious --- Is that all? There are even more outrageous ones --- Fake data is too obvious, just pass --- Only 300 views earlier, then 60,000 later. Who would believe that?
View OriginalReply0
SadMoneyMeowvip
· 6h ago
The data is so outrageous, buying is just taking the fall guy This wave is definitely being manipulated, it's too obvious 60,000 views and 32 likes? I laughed, it's obviously a scam I should have targeted these kinds of projects earlier, wasting my time Basically, it's the market manipulators cutting profits, anyone who touches it will die But on the other hand, these scams are becoming more sophisticated This kind of thing should have been blacklisted a long time ago
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshivip
· 6h ago
The data is so bizarre, there must be some tricks behind it. I've seen many cases of this kind of traffic discrepancy, and they all end badly. It should have been marked in red long ago; it's another typical rug pull scheme. Are you still chasing this project? I advise you not to. 32 likes, 60,000 views—this ratio is unthinkable even in my dreams. This is a common manipulation tactic in the crypto world, a warning sign before a pump. Instead of waiting for verification, it's better to just avoid it altogether.
View OriginalReply0
FunGibleTomvip
· 6h ago
The data is so outrageous, there must be something fishy 32 likes and 60,000 views? Who would believe that I've said it long ago, these kinds of schemes are all tricks Fake orders are too obvious, just avoid them Twitter data so fake, and they still dare to list the project? Basically, it's just a scam to harvest profits, I've seen through it long ago Traffic data is exposed as fake when compared, too amateurish This is a typical false prosperity, wake up everyone
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt