More and more analyses are pointing to the same conclusion: SocialFi is essentially a false proposition. Just look at the token holders of various projects now, and you'll see that many have become de facto bagholders.



Where is the problem? Frankly, forcibly embedding financial attributes into social products simply doesn't work. Users need genuine social experiences, not interactions hijacked by token mechanisms.

On the other hand? If social platforms are built solidly first, establishing a real user base and activity, then appropriately introducing financial tools, there is a chance. However... such projects can no longer be called SocialFi. This is something that project teams still dreaming big should consider.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHunterXiaovip
· 7h ago
Honestly, I'm already tired of it. This wave of SocialFi is just a Ponzi scheme disguised as Web3. The bagholders are still dreaming. Wake up, everyone. Why bother with financial integrations? Can't we just focus on building a good community? I just want to ask, who is really here for socializing? Isn't it all about the token price? Someone should have exposed this logic long ago. Focus on making a good product first, and don't rely on finance for everything.
View OriginalReply0
CoinBasedThinkingvip
· 7h ago
Oh, you're right. I've long been tired of the tricks that project teams play; packaging it up and calling it SocialFi. The ones that can truly survive still have to rely on the product itself to speak. More and more people are becoming the bagholders, and more and more are waking up. --- It seems that now everyone in social is thinking about how to cut the leeks, forgetting what really attracts people. --- Honestly, without a real user base, forcing in a token mechanism is just courting death. --- That's the problem—projects that do things the opposite way tend not to last long, but if they do it the right way, there aren't many fundraising stories. --- Everyone wants to make quick money in one step; there are no such things as pies falling from the sky.
View OriginalReply0
TommyTeachervip
· 7h ago
There are more and more "bagholders," it was about time someone exposed this facade. --- Exactly, social is just social; forcing financial mechanisms into it only ruins the user experience. --- So ultimately, it's the project teams wanting to harvest the early investors, disguising it as a nice SocialFi concept. --- I wish to see which project dares to truly perfect social before adding finance, but unfortunately, none do. --- A typical reverse operation, reversing priorities and harming both others and oneself.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)