A recent industry discussion has sparked a lot of reflection.

Regarding bullish market expectations, the target price of Bitcoin surging to 200,000 has been frequently mentioned. In comparison, where should Ethereum be valued? These numbers do have some reference significance, but honestly, the risks are evident, and they shouldn't be taken as ironclad rules.

What's even more interesting is a phenomenon within the industry—some KOLs seem eager to anchor market direction, as if trying to forcefully set the tone of the market with "professional predictions." Imagination is indeed rich, and the logic isn't without reason, but that's where the problem lies. Since they are speaking from this position, shouldn't they be more cautious sometimes? It's not that they can't make judgments, but whether the sense of responsibility behind those judgments has kept pace.

Assessments of primary and secondary markets are inherently full of uncertainties. At this point, it's even more important to see clearly who is speaking and how they are speaking.