One token faced community rejection after the team attempted to promote it independently. The project was ultimately declined by the primary stakeholder. However, a different token emerged as the actual performer in this scenario. What's notable here is the complete ownership and fee structure transfer to the stakeholder. The community took charge of the development and made the key decisions. This arrangement laid the groundwork for the token to launch and operate successfully. It's a case where decentralized decision-making and transparent ownership transitions shaped the project's direction.