#数字资产市场动态 Recently, RootData launched a "Transparency Sweep" campaign, directly calling out projects like MBD Financials, Geeq, Waterfall Network, Synthesys, and Rubix — the issues are quite concerning: their funding details are either incomplete or hidden, raising questions about their authenticity.

Honestly, this problem of information chaos has long needed a solution. RootData's transparency scoring system (graded from A to F) is actually quite practical — an A grade indicates complete and timely information, while an F grade is like a black hole of data. The lower the score, the greater the hidden risks.

Looking at it from another perspective, projects proactively revealing their funding details is a practice worth encouraging. By making core data public, their scores naturally improve, and investors can feel more assured. RootData's current oversight mechanism is interesting: projects that hide details for a long time will eventually be exposed.

That said, I want to ask everyone — what information do you care about most when investing? Funding rounds? Backers? Or specific numbers? Have you ever suffered losses due to opaque project information? $ETH