Having navigated the crypto market for years, I've seen many cycles of boom and bust. The ICO craze of 2017, the DeFi wave of 2020, the NFT frenzy of 2021—each cycle just rolled by one after another. Now, as we start 2026, I believe the rhythm of this cycle is quite clear—RWA (Real World Asset on-chain) is the true mainline.



The problem is, the market is filled with noise. There are so many projects claiming to be RWA that it's hard to count, and among them, some are genuine investments while others are pure scams. After reviewing over a hundred projects, my attention has focused on Dusk Network. Today, I want to set aside price fluctuations and have a good discussion—why I believe Dusk could become a bridge between traditional finance and Web3.

**The "Deadlock" of Traditional Financial Institutions**

Anyone who has dealt with large financial institutions knows that their entry into the crypto market is hindered by two main issues: privacy protection and compliance requirements.

JPMorgan, for example, can't reveal all their trading strategies and secrets on a public blockchain—that's their core confidential information; but from another perspective, they also dare not trade on fully anonymous chains, or they risk being targeted and fined by the SEC at any moment. This creates a deadlock cycle of "privacy—compliance—decentralization."

Dusk's strength lies in its ability to break this deadlock using zero-knowledge proof technology. Through its original Hedger solution and Citadel digital identity system, Dusk has created a trading space that is both confidential and compliant. In this system, transaction details can be hidden, and participants' identities can be constrained by the mechanism framework. This is exactly what traditional financial institutions truly need.
DUSK-5.26%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ForkMastervip
· 4h ago
The concept of zero-knowledge proofs has been talked about in the community for a long time, but very few can actually be applied in financial scenarios. If Dusk can truly balance privacy and compliance at the same time, then it’s definitely something. I need to study this Hedger solution more; compared to projects that casually raise funds under the guise of RWA, it’s much more reliable. That said, I’ve seen too many so-called "revolutionary" technologies that ultimately turn out to be vaporware. Let’s wait until the official version is released. The pain point for traditional financial institutions entering Web3 is indeed here, but whether Dusk can truly solve it depends on the results of the code audits. There are so many trash projects in the RWA track; finding ones with actual application scenarios is already a win. Honestly, I’ve also pondered the contradiction between privacy and compliance before. This idea is indeed innovative, but I don’t know how practical it will be once implemented. Having three kids, I’m now more concerned about which projects can survive long-term. I’ll stay away from those short-term hype schemes. If Dusk can genuinely make traditional finance feel safe to get on board, that would be the real inflection point for Web3—much more promising than those airdrop farms.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofGremlinvip
· 4h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs are indeed key, but whether Dusk can truly make the big players like JPMorgan willing to participate is still uncertain. Privacy compliance has been a long-standing contradiction with no good solution for years. Now, relying on a single chain to solve it? To put it nicely, implementation is the real challenge. I'm also optimistic about this wave of RWA, but brothers, don't let it turn into another round of cutting leeks.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegrettervip
· 4h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs sound promising, but can they really reassure big institutions? I'm still a bit skeptical. Traditional finance people actually just want insurance—someone to back them. Why should Dusk be able to do that? Both privacy and compliance—can they really be satisfied at the same time? Feels like compromises will be made on either side. I understand the direction of RWA this round, but I don't believe Dusk is that "bridge." Projects like these always get stuck at the SEC; no matter how good the technology is, it's useless. Hedger and Citadel sound impressive, but are there any real-world cases? Or is it just PPT-funded hype again? After reviewing hundreds of projects and still focusing on this one, is there something I haven't seen behind the scenes? I want to dig deeper, but I'm afraid of getting burned.
View OriginalReply0
AirDropMissedvip
· 4h ago
Zero-knowledge proofs sound impressive, but do they really make folks like JPMorgan Chase comfortable? I remain skeptical. Privacy and compliance are fundamentally at odds; no matter how you phrase it, it's like walking a tightrope. The RWA hot topic seems to be just a trend over the past two years. Don't let it turn into another wave that disappears after the hype. Does Dusk have any real-world use cases? Or is it just another PowerPoint presentation trying to change the world? Ultimately, compliance depends on policy. On-chain technology can't bypass SEC regulation. Just listen, truly legitimate projects never need so much explanation.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)