#Binance Alpha In this wave of market trends, the matters in the Alpha zone need to be discussed in detail, as the logic behind it is quite intriguing.

The cryptocurrencies WET and TRUMP have surged, and on the surface, it seems to be due to popularity and capital inflow. However, I've been monitoring Alpha for half a year, earning a bit from June to October, but after November, I started to sense something was off. The most intuitive observation is—why does Binance always wait for those meme coins to drop close to zero before listing Alpha? This doesn't quite align with the usual project selection logic.

I have two observations. One possibility is that Binance is helping retail investors at high positions to "stop loss"—using Alpha to pump the price to give them an opportunity to sell, which sounds fairly reasonable. But the other possibility is a bit sensitive: if internal employees take the opportunity to buy at the bottom when the coin goes to zero, and then use the traffic and popularity of the Alpha zone to drive up the coin price, this operation could be seen as a disguised benefit.

The current issue is not whether one can make money, but rather that one should be more cautious when participating in these types of coins. DOYR has gone Alpha, but I won't blindly follow the trend. The lifecycles of these coins are particularly short; they may soar 100% today, but start to weaken tomorrow. Just look at that ZEC case to understand—when it rises to 440, it's time to take profits, don't wait until the M top and divergence occur to react.

To survive in this wave of market, the core point is simple: clarify whether it is an ascending triangle or a trap, whether it is genuine demand or the market maker laying the groundwork. Lowering interest rates will indeed release liquidity, but liquidity will also be concentrated on a few hot coins, and most followers are just picking up the last baton. Enter again when the price pulls back to the position, don't chase the highs, that's the bottom line.