Quantum computing approaching? Bitcoin needs ten years to upgrade its defenses, 1.7 million BTC face risks

【CryptoWorld】Smart contract pioneer Nic Carter recently published an in-depth analysis discussing the real threat of quantum computing to Bitcoin security. According to renowned quantum theory scholar Scott Aaronson’s research, cracking Bitcoin doesn’t actually require breakthroughs in physics—it’s merely an “extremely difficult” engineering problem.

Sounds like there’s still hope, right? Theoretically, there are solutions. Bitcoin could introduce “post-quantum” (PQ) signature schemes through a soft fork, and there are indeed many quantum-resistant encryption schemes available on the market. But the reality is much more complicated.

First, a decision must be made on which post-quantum scheme to use. Second, a network-wide soft fork must be organized—which is a dual challenge of political and technical nature. The most troublesome part is that millions of addresses with balances need to be migrated. Nic Carter’s conclusion is that this upgrade process could take nearly ten years to complete.

Even more concerning is that a large number of vulnerable Bitcoin addresses are sitting in abandoned wallets. The original owners of these addresses have long disappeared, making it impossible to force them to transfer their assets. Therefore, even if Bitcoin upgrades to post-quantum signatures, approximately 1.7 million BTC remain at risk of being stolen overnight by quantum attackers.

To eliminate this risk entirely, the Bitcoin community not only needs to promote a coordinated and timely upgrade but also requires all holders to agree to “freeze” these 1.7 million BTC. This has never happened before in Bitcoin’s history. Nic Carter thus urges Bitcoin developers and the community to stop being overly optimistic and to take action now.

BTC0.57%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BoredApeResistancevip
· 12-23 02:04
Ten years? By then, Quantum Computing will have to be updated, right? This logic is a bit convoluted.
View OriginalReply0
zkNoobvip
· 12-22 00:30
Ten years? By then, Quantum Computing will have already arrived, this logic is a bit convoluted.
View OriginalReply0
MetaNeighborvip
· 12-20 05:10
Ten years? Really? Then the 1.7 million BTC would have been cracked by quantum computers long ago. Why bother upgrading then?
View OriginalReply0
TokenSleuthvip
· 12-20 05:02
Ten years? Haha, that's hilarious. If the Bitcoin community can reach consensus within ten years, that would be a win. --- Soft forks sound simple, but in reality, it's a political drama. Who will make the final decision? --- Is the claim that 1.7 million BTC are at risk a bit exaggerated? By the time that happens, there might already be a solution. --- Migrating tens of millions of addresses... just thinking about it gives me a headache. This is even more complicated than upgrading Ethereum. --- Just say it's extremely difficult, anyway. Quantum computing will take many years to mature, no rush. --- Articles like this are just to create anxiety. You can tell by looking at the market reaction.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekConfessionvip
· 12-20 04:53
Ten years? Ha, can we live until then? --- Soft forks, post-quantum, migration addresses... just hearing these gives me a headache. Can the decision-makers avoid arguing until 2034? --- 1.7 million BTC waiting to be mined, and the community hasn't even finalized a plan. Isn't this just gambling on whether humanity can catch the quantum train? --- "Extremely difficult engineering problem" translates to: The money is here, now it's up to you guys. --- Ten-year upgrade cycle? Laughable. It takes the Bitcoin community three years to agree on anything. Is that reliable? --- No way, they'll only act when quantum comes knocking. Humans really have this flaw. --- Carter said it beautifully, but in practice... migrating tens of millions of addresses, how many people will this cost?
View OriginalReply0
APY_Chaservip
· 12-20 04:52
Ten years? That's laughable. If the Bitcoin community could reach a consensus within ten years, I would eat my keyboard.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)