Solana's validator scene? Absolute bloodbath. Numb

Question

CryptoPhoenix · Accepted Answer

68% blood crash... This is the real touchstone, the bottom range is right in front of us, believers will transcend the cycle [laughing with tears]

---

17 million threshold? Think about it this way, isn't this dip just a cleansing before institutional entry? Rebirth requires a price

---

The red line at 750 nodes... It indeed struck a nerve, but the more dangerous the place, the greater the opportunity. Patience is the greatest weapon

---

Once again, reality teaches us a lesson, but only those who have gone through these can laugh last in the bull market

---

Capital inflow + validator collapse = a new ecological restructuring? Instead of panicking, it's better to observe calmly

---

Day N of rebuilding mindset, this wave is nothing, the true phoenix is right here

GasFeePhobia · Answer

$17 million threshold... Where's the promised decentralization? This is the new aristocracy.

---

The hurdle of 750 validation nodes—really playing with fire. Even with institutional involvement, this situation can't be saved.

---

Big news is being hyped every day, while the underlying system is bleeding... A typical Web3 magical realism.

---

An 68% crash—this isn't a correction, it's systemic decline.

---

Everyone is watching Wall Street daddy, no one cares that more than half of the validators have already died.

---

$17 million still might not be profitable; this business is truly failing.

---

Behind the wave of validator node exits, no one wants to chat.

---

It's not infrastructure failure; it's directly accelerating towards death.

ShibaOnTheRun · Answer

17 million dollar threshold? That's hilarious. Might as well just go all in on Dogecoin for more reliability.

2. Validators are losing money, but Wall Street is just bragging. Truly ironic.

3. The 750 red line is almost reached, but no one is saying a word, everyone is just chasing trending news.

4. As for Solana's infrastructure... by the way, my friend's node shut down three months ago.

5. Who isn't upset about the 68% drop? It's obvious this approach doesn't work.

SnapshotBot · Answer

Hmm, another chain has fallen due to validator economics. This is the current state of Web3.

DAOTruant · Answer

$17 million threshold? Laughs. Is this the future of Web3 democratization?

Validators are bleeding out, but institutional news dominates all trending searches—irony.

The critical point of 750 nodes is approaching, and no one is taking it seriously. I really can't hold on.

Validators are losing every epoch. What kind of ecosystem is this?

Institutional entry indeed looks attractive, but if the foundation is already rotten, who cares?

Validator nodes have been cut from 2,500 to 800. That's a terrifying number, right?

Large holders are celebrating, validators are bleeding, and there's a big problem with the ecosystem structure.

Is this what they call decentralization? It’s just a club for the wealthy.

GateUser-afe07a92 · Answer

Is $17 million enough to run a validator? That's laughable. Is this really decentralization?

2. When institutions come in, they go wild, and the underlying validators are dying off without anyone caring... a typical capital story.

3. If you really hit the $750 mark, it could cause a big issue. And yet, people still pretend they don't see it.

4. Dropping from 2500 to 800, the ratio is a bit crazy. Feels like the Solana story is coming to an end.

5. Running a validator and losing money every epoch, yet still maintaining operation—these validators are really making a killing.

6. So, can big players save the market just by entering? I don't think so... No matter how much money you have, if the infrastructure is broken, it's useless.

7. That's why I'm losing confidence in Solana. It looks shiny on the surface, but it's full of holes underneath.

8. The $17 million threshold? Isn't that just turning into an elite club? And what about true decentralization?

9. Seeing so many news reports of validators running away, I've gotten used to it. Maybe this time is really different.

10. Who the hell still wants to be a validator? Even if it means losing everything, no one even asks.

SellTheBounce · Answer

I've seen too many of these situations. Before institutions come in, the fundamentals always collapse first. Lessons from history.

---

$17 million is needed to survive? Ha, the next mining disaster will reveal who's actually swimming naked.

---

The hurdle of 750 validators... will eventually be broken, and when it rebounds, it's time to sell.

---

News headlines vs. actual losses, an eternal disconnect. Just watching it is annoying.

---

A 68% decline is never the bottom; there are always lower points waiting for the bagholders.

---

Institutions come in, prices rise, but validators are dying. This logic itself is very valuable.

---

Two operators withdrew within two months? Wait, there will be a third.

---

Who still believes in some ecosystem great benefits... The foundational layer is bleeding, and any hype is just air.

---

That's why I never chase the bottom. It looks like a solid bottom now, but next year it will be a joke.

AirdropHustler · Answer

Damn, starting at 17 million USD? Are they trying to completely push retail investors out?

Solana's validator scene? Absolute bloodbath. Numbers crashed 68% - from 2,500 nodes down to barely 800. This month alone, two more operators threw in the towel, both citing losses every single epoch they run.

Trending Topics

2025GateYearEndSummary

CryptoMarketMildlyRebounds

GateChristmasVibes

SantaRallyBegins

CreatorETFs

Hot Gate Fun

Pin