Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, I’ve been hearing everyone hype AI Agents to automatically handle tasks on-chain. To be honest, I’m pretty tempted—it saves effort. But once you actually run it, there are still a few parts that must be covered by humans: First is the boundary condition of “whether I should do this transaction or not.” The Agent is good at calculating routes and fee structures, but it doesn’t take the blame—or the risk—if “this project/this pool suddenly pulls liquidity.” Second is authorization and signing: if the permissions are too broad, I won’t be able to rest easy; if they’re too narrow, it just keeps failing. In the end, a person still has to watch and properly lock down things like the whitelist, limits, and expiration times. Third is exception handling—getting stuck in pending, routes suddenly getting more expensive, MEV getting in the way… it might still be “optimizing,” but only a manual stop from you can stop the bleeding.
Memes and celebrity-style attention cycles are even more troublesome. What the Agent sees is that on-chain trades are hot; what you have to consider is whether “I’m the last one in the line.” I need to be reminded: automation can only help me do fewer errands—it can’t save me from making fewer stupid mistakes. First, clearly write down the maximum amount I’m willing to lose, and then we’ll talk.