Recently, people have been discussing whether on-chain privacy is truly a "original sin." My own expectation is quite simple: on-chain is not anonymous, just "pseudonymous." If you really want to look up someone, it mainly depends on time and probability, especially once you've interacted with exchanges and fiat channels, the compliance line will gradually pull you back to reality.

To put it plainly, ordinary users want to avoid being casually opened, avoid being tracked through data breaches, but also shouldn't expect to instantly become invisible and untouchable. The best they can do is be less careless: use separate addresses, avoid reckless signing, don't tie social accounts too tightly to wallets... the rest is left to probability—don't treat luck as destiny.

By the way, the NFT royalty war also looks quite similar: creators want stable income, but the market complains that liquidity is being stuck. Privacy and compliance are also similar, always a tug-of-war between the two, and the final result is usually "usable but not so smooth." I'll just continue to take it slow, like growing succulents—don't pour too much water at once.