Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, someone complained again about issues with cross-chain bridges, so I took the opportunity to review the IBC message-passing protocol. To put it simply, a single cross-chain transfer isn't just "click and go"; you're actually trusting that: both chains won't malfunction, the light client/proof of validation won't be forged, the relayer won't slack off, and the application layer's contract logic isn't maliciously written. Missing any one of these links can cause delays or distortions.
I'm not regretful about the outcome, but about the fact that I used to think "it's all part of the big ecosystem, it should be stable," and I was too lazy to see who I was actually trusting... Now, seeing the disputes over MEV and fair ordering, with miners/validators under increasing income pressure, who knows if someone might have malicious intentions. Anyway, I'm still the same: I avoid cross-chain transfers if possible; if I must, I do small amounts and batch them, and just wait it out.