# Translation

The same market movement offers different entry opportunities depending on your trading strategy. Whether it's the trendline most commonly used by beginners, the intuitive support and resistance levels, the seemingly sophisticated Fibonacci retracement, or the so-called "simplicity is elegance" naked candlesticks—they all provide a coordinate system for observing the market from a certain dimension. So what's the key point? What's the difference? What matters most for traders? The difference lies in: the "dimension" and "time scale" through which they observe the market. Trendlines outline direction; support and resistance define zones; Fibonacci measures wave proportions; naked candlesticks focus on pure price action itself. There's no high or low, right or wrong—only whether they align with your market understanding and current volatility characteristics. The key point is always: can you understand and trust the "boundaries" of the tools you use? Every tool has scenarios where it works and scenarios where it fails. Attempting to catch every reversal with trendlines, or using Fibonacci to precisely predict every endpoint, is a misuse of the tool. For traders, what matters most is: the perspective you choose for technical analysis must be objective—the more objective, the more likely you'll "unlock" the door to profitability. If the technical analysis method you choose is highly subjective, emotional, and narrative-driven, you'll find trading becomes increasingly painful, and enlightenment remains just a pane of glass away, but...