Futures
Hundreds of contracts settled in USDT or BTC
TradFi
Gold
Trade global traditional assets with USDT in one place
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Futures Kickoff
Get prepared for your futures trading
Futures Events
Participate in events to win generous rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to experience risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and enjoy airdrop rewards!
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Investment
Simple Earn
Earn interests with idle tokens
Auto-Invest
Auto-invest on a regular basis
Dual Investment
Buy low and sell high to take profits from price fluctuations
Soft Staking
Earn rewards with flexible staking
Crypto Loan
0 Fees
Pledge one crypto to borrow another
Lending Center
One-stop lending hub
VIP Wealth Hub
Customized wealth management empowers your assets growth
Private Wealth Management
Customized asset management to grow your digital assets
Quant Fund
Top asset management team helps you profit without hassle
Staking
Stake cryptos to earn in PoS products
Smart Leverage
New
No forced liquidation before maturity, worry-free leveraged gains
GUSD Minting
Use USDT/USDC to mint GUSD for treasury-level yields
#Trump’s15%GlobalTariffsSettoTakeEffect The tariffs imposed by the Donald Trump administration at ABD’s ABD Customs have once again been brought to court. 24 states filed a lawsuit against the federal government, claiming that President Donald Trump exceeded his authority by implementing new global tariffs despite the Supreme Court’s decision in February.
In the lawsuit filed on Thursday, a total of 24 states argued that the 10% import tariffs implemented under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 are unlawful. President Trump had previously announced plans to raise these tariffs to 15%.
The states argued that the practice violates the principle of separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution. The lawsuit states that the President cannot use tariff authority without explicit authorization from Congress.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in a decision last month with a 6-3 vote, ruled that the emergency tariffs imposed by Trump last year cannot be applied under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977. The Court stated that the President does not have the authority to impose tariffs under this law.
The President, as in his previous unlawful use of IEEPA, is now using a tariff authority he does not have, undermining the constitutional order and causing chaos in the global economy.
The Trump administration argues that the import tariffs are implemented to ensure fairness in global trade, increase investments in the U.S., and boost public revenues. According to official data, the U.S. generated a total of $287 billion from tariffs, duties, and other import revenues in 2025. This represents a 192% increase compared to the previous year.
In their lawsuit, the states request that the U.S. International Trade Court declare the tariffs applied under Section 122 illegal. They also seek reimbursement for the costs incurred during the period the tariffs were in effect.
INVESTMENT ADVISORY IS NOT A RECOMMENDATION
()(