Recently, I came across the mechanism design of a token project, and I think the approach is quite interesting. Let’s break down the core profit logic.
First is the basic income part. The daily yield is about 1%, but this quota is limited and operates on a first-come, first-served basis. In addition, holding tokens also allows you to share in the main coin’s earnings, which is like multi-coin dividends. The consensus market cap also generates profit distribution, which is based on the size of holdings.
Next is the enhanced income. The top 100 holding addresses each day can share 1% of the native token’s earnings, which is designed to incentivize leading community members. If you provide liquidity as an LP, you also receive a 1% dividend income. There are also 31 core consensus nodes that receive a dedicated 1% profit support, seemingly to lock in the community’s core strength.
The most aggressive is the deflation mechanism — destroying 4.32% of the circulating supply daily. This is quite a significant rate; at this speed, the token supply will continue to shrink.
Overall, the combination of multi-layered earnings and high-speed deflation can indeed attract attention. But how long this model can sustain depends on real ecosystem applications and community retention. What do you think about the sustainability of this mechanism?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoNomics
· 14h ago
honestly the 4.32% daily burn rate is just... mathematically unsustainable without actual utility driving real volume. if you run a simple exponential decay model, ceteris paribus, you're looking at token scarcity becoming a deflationary spiral within 18 months. the layered yield structure is textbook ponzi architecture dressed up in fancy tokenomics language ngl
Reply0
MevSandwich
· 14h ago
4.32% daily burn? That number sounds outrageous; it feels like a pie that won't last long.
View OriginalReply0
fren.eth
· 14h ago
It's the same old trick again, with dazzling dividend numbers. 4.32% daily burn? Sounds like they're digging their own grave.
View OriginalReply0
DegenMcsleepless
· 14h ago
It's the same old trick again—daily release of 1% on a first-come, first-served basis. After one round is finished, we'll do another round.
Recently, I came across the mechanism design of a token project, and I think the approach is quite interesting. Let’s break down the core profit logic.
First is the basic income part. The daily yield is about 1%, but this quota is limited and operates on a first-come, first-served basis. In addition, holding tokens also allows you to share in the main coin’s earnings, which is like multi-coin dividends. The consensus market cap also generates profit distribution, which is based on the size of holdings.
Next is the enhanced income. The top 100 holding addresses each day can share 1% of the native token’s earnings, which is designed to incentivize leading community members. If you provide liquidity as an LP, you also receive a 1% dividend income. There are also 31 core consensus nodes that receive a dedicated 1% profit support, seemingly to lock in the community’s core strength.
The most aggressive is the deflation mechanism — destroying 4.32% of the circulating supply daily. This is quite a significant rate; at this speed, the token supply will continue to shrink.
Overall, the combination of multi-layered earnings and high-speed deflation can indeed attract attention. But how long this model can sustain depends on real ecosystem applications and community retention. What do you think about the sustainability of this mechanism?