Interesting phenomenon: a certain cryptocurrency has a relatively high on-chain consensus and sufficient liquidity, so its performance shouldn't be so disappointing. But upon closer inspection, the so-called potential coins and hot concept coins actually have pretty average holdings distribution. Does this reflect a problem—having liquidity support alone isn't enough; we also need to see where the real participation in terms of actual capital is. From a fundamental perspective, the data looks fine, but the market's real response is discounted. This mismatch is worth pondering.