2026-01-19 10:26:19

Bitcoin quickly surged from 3100, but this rally is largely to prepare for subsequent position building. Today has already begun the first round of correction, and it is expected that there will be further induced buying up to around 3250, creating buying opportunities for those chasing the high. The real downtrend is just beginning.

From a technical perspective, 3030 is the initial position for accumulation, followed by additional purchases at 3330. The target for this correction points to the 2700 area. If this logic holds, there is still considerable downside potential.

The key is to坚持 holding, and not be tempted by intermediate rebounds. Waiting for the true bottom to appear is the core profit point of this operation. Market rhythm is often like this—first despair, then surprise.

BTC-3,24%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NonFungibleDegen

· 01-22 07:55

ngl this accumulation thesis lowkey hits different... but 2700? ser that's still pretty cope if we're being real lol. holding through the fakeouts is always the hardest part tbh

Reply0

VitalikFanAccount

· 01-22 06:20

Is this the same routine again? First pump up then dump, old trick. --- Can 2700 really be reached? Feels like just another pie in the sky. --- Holding on to your position, right? Last time I said that, I lost two months' salary. --- Inducing a rally to 3250 haha, so confident, let's wait and see. --- The market can act so dramatically, despair is gone and so is the surprise. --- It's hard to tell from the chart, how can we be sure it's this rhythm? --- Don't be tempted by the rebound, but also don't fall for this kind of rhetoric. --- We still have to wait for the bottom, can you all wait? --- If 2700 really comes, then I'll believe it.

View OriginalReply0

YieldFarmRefugee

· 01-20 09:36

Here comes the old trick of cutting leeks again, aiming for a low point at 2700? I think you're trying to buy the dip all the way down to the floor. One set of tricks to lure bullish and another to lure bearish, I've seen through the tricks of you analysts a long time ago. Talking so confidently, dare to go all in? Anyway, I don't believe in this prophecy anymore. Are you really going to be hopeless this time? You said the same last time... Holding on stubbornly? My stop-loss order was already triggered long ago. What are you waiting for, a lower point?

View OriginalReply0

SurvivorshipBias

· 01-19 10:55

It's the same logic again—诱多, pullback, lows... I've heard this so many times. Either I've already made a killing, or I've lost everything long ago. Those who can pinpoint the exact bottom are probably out there buying lottery tickets, not here analyzing 2700. I just want to know, will this "true bottom" be another "诱多 at a high" next time? Holding on stubbornly, huh? Sounds easy, but when you actually lose 30%, you'll know what agony really feels like. But there is some truth to it—markets are just playing psychological warfare... The problem is, my mental resilience isn't strong enough.

View OriginalReply0

ProbablyNothing

· 01-19 10:55

Coming back with the same trick to lure more buyers? I feel like you say this every time. Basically, you just want to trap us at the top. Can 2700 really drop that much? It's a bit uncertain. I'll still wait and see, don't get caught up in the hype.

View OriginalReply0

DeadTrades_Walking

· 01-19 10:54

Starting to draw lines again. This wave with 3250诱多, I bet five bucks it's still going to fall. Wait, can 2700 really be reached? Feels a bit uncertain. Does anyone really hold on? Honestly, I can't hold on. This kind of psychological game is so annoying. As soon as there's a rebound, I want to run. 2700... I'm thinking of trying a small-scale bottom-fishing to test the waters.

View OriginalReply0

Rugpull幸存者

· 01-19 10:52

Is this another pump-and-dump? I just don't buy it. --- If you can't get past level 3250, it means the whales aren't ready yet. --- Holding until 2700? Ha, I'm afraid I won't last until then. --- First despair, then surprise. Just hearing that sounds unbelievable. My despair has long turned into numbness. --- This time, it really can't be fake. The bottom is probably right in front of us. --- It's the same logic again. We said the same thing last time... --- Wait, building a position at 3030 and adding more at 3330, and now it’s supposed to drop to 2700? The whales are really ruthless. --- I just want to know, how many people can hold on until 2700?

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainDecoder

· 01-19 10:49

From a technical perspective, this 3030-3330 building position logic is indeed interesting, but I have to say that the target level of 2700 might be too optimistic. Data shows that recent selling pressure has not reached historical extremes.

View OriginalReply0

ConfusedWhale

· 01-19 10:44

Oh, here we go again, rising first then falling, a classic move for seasoned players. Wait, can this logic really reach 2700? It's a bit uncertain. Hold on to your position? Easy to say, but having the mindset to withstand the dip is the real skill.

View OriginalReply0

WinterWarmthCat

· 01-19 10:28

Is this another trap to lure more buyers? I just want to see who gets trapped this time. --- Can 2700 really be reached? It feels like just another pie in the sky. --- Holding on stubbornly... Everyone said that last year and lost money. --- The temptation of a rebound, I'm used to it, it doesn't matter. --- Waiting for the low point? The low point is always at the next low. --- This logic sounds very clear, but in practice... --- Being repeatedly cut and still having to endure, it's truly incredible. --- 2700 to lure more buyers, building positions at 3030... this routine is worn out. --- Core profit point 😅 I just want to break even. --- First despair, then surprise? Why do I only feel despair?

View OriginalReply0