What if we completely reimagined how AI systems are governed?
Amitabh Chaudhry from Axis Bank raised a thought-provoking question at WEF26: How do we rebuild the systems, skills, and core values that shape AI development to ensure more equitable progress?
It's a fascinating angle. Right now, AI governance often feels concentrated in the hands of a few major players. But what if we introduced more distributed decision-making, transparency in how AI models are trained and deployed, and broader stakeholder input?
The challenge runs deeper than just tech—it touches on how we structure institutions, what expertise we prioritize, and whether our values around fairness actually translate into real-world outcomes. From Web3's perspective, concepts like decentralized governance could offer fresh approaches here.
Think about it: transparent frameworks, community participation in protocol decisions, and mechanisms that resist single-point-of-failure scenarios. These aren't just blockchain ideas anymore—they could reshape how we think about responsible AI systems across industries.
The real question isn't just what kind of AI we're building. It's who gets a say in building it, and whether we're creating systems that benefit everyone or just consolidate power.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
FreeRider
· 01-15 12:29
Decentralized AI governance sounds ideal, but who in the real world would truly delegate authority?
View OriginalReply0
RektHunter
· 01-15 12:13
ngl, this is just talking about big companies' monopolies, I've been tired of it for a long time. Rehashing the Web3 decentralization theory again, what can it really solve...
View OriginalReply0
CryptoGoldmine
· 01-15 12:06
Decentralized governance sounds great, but computing power and voting rights will still be concentrated in a few major nodes. This is an economic law that cannot be changed.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressMiner
· 01-15 12:02
Laughing out loud, talking about "decentralized governance" again. I'm looking at the fund flow chart. I already traced the wallet addresses of those major players, and the flow of governance tokens is crystal clear... Do they really think that creating a DAO can change the world? The early coin-holding addresses have long since completed wealth transfer, and now even the fairness progress bar hasn't moved.
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizer
· 01-15 12:01
Nah, this is about how AI governance is now being monopolized by big corporations. The decentralized logic of Web3 is indeed worth learning from.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeVictim
· 01-15 12:00
Basically, it's about decentralization, but in reality, big companies won't truly delegate authority; it's all just for show.
What if we completely reimagined how AI systems are governed?
Amitabh Chaudhry from Axis Bank raised a thought-provoking question at WEF26: How do we rebuild the systems, skills, and core values that shape AI development to ensure more equitable progress?
It's a fascinating angle. Right now, AI governance often feels concentrated in the hands of a few major players. But what if we introduced more distributed decision-making, transparency in how AI models are trained and deployed, and broader stakeholder input?
The challenge runs deeper than just tech—it touches on how we structure institutions, what expertise we prioritize, and whether our values around fairness actually translate into real-world outcomes. From Web3's perspective, concepts like decentralized governance could offer fresh approaches here.
Think about it: transparent frameworks, community participation in protocol decisions, and mechanisms that resist single-point-of-failure scenarios. These aren't just blockchain ideas anymore—they could reshape how we think about responsible AI systems across industries.
The real question isn't just what kind of AI we're building. It's who gets a say in building it, and whether we're creating systems that benefit everyone or just consolidate power.