Malaysia's position on Grok takes an interesting turn: authorities signal willingness to reconsider the restriction if safety measures can be demonstrated. The potential lift on the ban hinges on proving the AI tool operates without posing risks to users and the broader ecosystem. This reflects a growing trend among regulators worldwide—rather than outright prohibition, there's an emerging emphasis on verification and risk assessment. For the AI and Web3 communities, it's a reminder that regulatory doors aren't necessarily closing; they're simply requiring proof of responsible operation.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
VitalikFanAccount
· 15h ago
Regulations are loosening... Basically, it's about proving you're not causing trouble. Can security audits really solve everything? Feels like just playing Tai Chi.
View OriginalReply0
ContractHunter
· 15h ago
Ha, Malaysia's move is interesting. I finally understand—it's better to regulate than ban, right?
Proving safety can lead to lifting restrictions? This trick will have to be played like this in the future; regulation is also evolving.
But on the other hand, who defines "safety"? Here we go again with the endless bickering.
Betting five bucks, Grok still can't pass that hurdle haha.
Regulatory easing isn't necessarily good or bad; it depends on who is smarter in the follow-up.
This approach applies to Web3 as well. Don't always think about fighting and resisting; just prove you can do it.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofGremlin
· 15h ago
Wow, Malaysia's move this time is quite interesting... Instead of cutting directly, they want to prove something? This way of thinking is gradually becoming smarter.
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizeMe
· 16h ago
Hmm... Has the regulatory attitude softened? Honestly, it's all about money and data. Anyway, security measures can be justified no matter how you prove them.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-1a2ed0b9
· 16h ago
Malaysia's recent move is quite interesting; it's not a blanket ban, but rather depends on how you prove yourself... It seems this is the common approach in global regulation—everyone is asking for proof documents haha
Malaysia's position on Grok takes an interesting turn: authorities signal willingness to reconsider the restriction if safety measures can be demonstrated. The potential lift on the ban hinges on proving the AI tool operates without posing risks to users and the broader ecosystem. This reflects a growing trend among regulators worldwide—rather than outright prohibition, there's an emerging emphasis on verification and risk assessment. For the AI and Web3 communities, it's a reminder that regulatory doors aren't necessarily closing; they're simply requiring proof of responsible operation.