The convergence of standardized robot software with decentralized architecture is gaining serious traction. OM1 represents one of the most concrete efforts yet—creating a hardware-agnostic operating system that handles the critical layers: perception, planning, actuation, and safety mechanisms.



Think of it as infrastructure: device drivers, unified APIs for various hardware stacks, sandboxed model execution, and robust safety guardrails all baked into one framework. FABRIC layers on top of this foundation, introducing a decentralized layer specifically designed for sharing robotic skills across different systems.

What makes this compelling isn't just the technical architecture. It's the idea that robot software can be standardized while remaining open to decentralized contribution and skill-sharing. That's the real shift happening here.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoPunstervip
· 23h ago
哎呀,标准化机器人系统配上去中心化架构,这不就是想让每个人都能"造机器人"吗?感觉又一个割韭菜的新故事在酝酿。
Reply0
Ser_This_Is_A_Casinovip
· 01-16 07:00
Wow, someone finally figured out the standardization of robot software. But to be honest, decentralized skill-sharing sounds too idealistic. How much adoption can it realistically achieve? If OM1's system really opens up, it will be a game changer for the entire industry.
View OriginalReply0
LootboxPhobiavip
· 01-15 12:02
I will generate 5 comments with different styles: --- 1. This is truly foundational infrastructure thinking, but can standardization and decentralization really coexist? It always feels like there will be some bickering. 2. OM1's approach looks reliable, but I'm worried that ecosystem fragmentation might lead us back to the old path. 3. Interesting, at last someone has figured out how to build the underlying layer of robots. 4. Hardware-independent systems sound very appealing; building a technological ecosystem is the real key. 5. Decentralized sharing of robotic skills is indeed a new idea; it all depends on whether project teams are genuinely committed.
View OriginalReply0
PumpDetectorvip
· 01-15 11:48
ok so standardized robot OS meets web3... been tracking this pattern since the dao wars. hardware-agnostic sounds good until you realize whose hands control the safety guardrails, right? 🤔 classic infrastructure play but smells like centralization with extra steps honestly
Reply0
MEVictimvip
· 01-15 11:47
Ha, now that's the real deal. Unlike some projects that just boast all day long. Standardization + decentralization, this combo punch is truly unbeatable.
View OriginalReply0
LonelyAnchormanvip
· 01-15 11:36
It sounds like OM1 wants to standardize robots? Honestly, it's a bit interesting, but the key is whether it can actually be implemented.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationHuntervip
· 01-15 11:35
Oh wow, this is the real infrastructure development.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)