Recently, Berachain's performance has indeed been intriguing. On January 14th, the BERA token price jumped from $0.5 directly to $0.9, which was a surprise in a trend that had previously experienced 12 consecutive declines. On the same day, the foundation released its year-end summary, discussing a lot of achievements in ecosystem expansion and technical optimization, but the tone also reflected the pressure brought by market volatility.



Honestly, during this period since the Berachain mainnet launched, both the token price and TVL haven't looked very promising. Behind this, it might not just be a market cycle issue, but more a result of internal strategies colliding with external pressures.

When the mainnet officially went live last February, Berachain introduced the PoL consensus mechanism—proof of liquidity, which is quite a novel setup. We've seen PoS quite a lot, but here they use proof of liquidity to incentivize application and user participation, aiming to create a Layer 1 chain specifically designed for DeFi. The logic sounds clear: higher capital efficiency, better user adoption.

The initial ecosystem expansion indeed did not disappoint. Hundreds of dApps flooded in, including DEXs, lending protocols, and NFT marketplaces. DEXs like BEX became the main players in the ecosystem. The data from that period was quite impressive—TVL once surged to $3.3 billion, with over 140,000 active addresses. If this momentum continued, it seemed possible to create a differentiated public chain.

But now? TVL has dropped to $1.8 billion. This decline can't be simply explained by "market correction." The 24-hour on-chain revenue is only $84, which indicates what? It shows that the actual activity and value generated by the ecosystem are not as optimistic as the data suggests.

This kind of drop from high to low usually reflects three issues: first, the initial attraction may have been more driven by hype rather than actual demand; second, whether the PoL mechanism can truly incentivize sustainable ecosystem development remains to be seen; third, in the competition with other Layer 1 chains, Berachain's differentiated advantages still need more time to be validated.

However, from another perspective, large fluctuations are also common in the development of new public chains. The key is whether the foundation can retain users and enhance value creation through genuine product iterations and ecosystem improvements. Otherwise, even if the token price rises again, it will only be a fleeting reflection.
BERA9,74%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NFTArchaeologistvip
· 23h ago
It's the same old story, I can recite the tale of opening high and closing low. Berachain dropping from 3.3 billion to 180 million, this isn't just a correction, it's the textbook example of cutting leeks. PoL sounds innovative, but in reality? The data speaks for itself, a daily income of $84, are they joking? Just want to see how the foundation will spin this lie next.
View OriginalReply0
TokenToastervip
· 01-15 11:57
3.3 billion dropped to 180 million, this is the true portrayal of Bera. PoL sounds good but is actually ineffective in practice.
View OriginalReply0
SellTheBouncevip
· 01-15 11:57
TVL dropped from 3.3 billion to 180 million. This is the tombstone of a bagholder. When there's a rebound, it's time to exit. History always repeats itself.
View OriginalReply0
UncommonNPCvip
· 01-15 11:57
TVL dropped from 3.3 billion to 180 million, which is almost like telling a story of a bubble burst... The PoL mechanism sounds good, but whether it can actually hold up remains to be seen.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOrektGuyvip
· 01-15 11:56
TVL dropped from 3.3 billion to 180 million, this is not just an adjustment, it's a major collapse. The PoL mechanism sounds very sexy but its actual utility is just so-so. How long can the January rally last? No one knows. From 3.3 billion to 180 million, it's truly outrageous. Honestly, I felt it was fake when the initial data looked good, and now it's been validated. Another "differentiated public chain," another "just a fleeting moment"... I'm tired of this rhetoric. A daily income of $84, I feel embarrassed for the foundation.
View OriginalReply0
governance_ghostvip
· 01-15 11:52
TVL dropped from 3.3 billion to 180 million, how embarrassing... It looks like a fleeting story.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyIssuesvip
· 01-15 11:37
3.3 billion to 180 million, how hard must the loss have been... But speaking of which, Bera's surge indeed looks like a last gasp, no matter how nicely the foundation talks, the on-chain data has to speak for itself.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropChaservip
· 01-15 11:35
3.3 billion to 180 million, the decline is really outrageous. The PoL mechanism seems to be just so-so.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)