2026-01-15 10:32:02

Some projects use charity as a guise, but it's really just a marketing gimmick. Just look at Giggle's operation to understand — with a market cap of only $80,000, they suddenly threw $100,000 USDT into charity. How does that math work out? In contrast, truly socially responsible projects never rely on this rhetoric to attract attention. The market always sees through it clearly.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

OnchainUndercover

· 01-15 11:01

View OriginalReply0

OnChainDetective

· 01-15 11:01

nah this smells like textbook wallet clustering behavior... 8k mcap dumping 10k into "charity"? transaction pattern screams counterparty risk obfuscation tbh

Reply0

HalfBuddhaMoney

· 01-15 11:00

A market cap of 80,000 splurging 100,000 on charity— isn't this a suicidal marketing strategy?

View OriginalReply0

RektDetective

· 01-15 10:56

Ha, it's the same old trick again. Investing 80,000 with 100,000 USDT in market cap—what's that if not charity? Real projects have long been quietly making money; there's no need to boast about charity every day. Giggle, this move is really a bit outrageous; they truly can't keep the accounts straight. I've seen too many projects like this, and they all end up running away eventually. Can the market see through this? Not necessarily; many people still get scammed.

View OriginalReply0

ForkTongue

· 01-15 10:49

Oh my god, this calculation is flawless. A market cap of 80,000 smashing 100,000 US dollars into charity—what kind of suicidal marketing is this? I'm really laughing to death. I've seen this kind of trick way too many times.

View OriginalReply0