The $SIXR campaign wrapped up recently, and the leaderboard results tell an interesting story. In the 30-day rankings—likely the metric that'll carry the most weight—participants are spread across a wide range, with positions in the mid-tier range reflecting the competitive nature of the initiative.
What's remarkable is the momentum behind $SIXR, particularly given the project narrative built on a substantial 2.5B valuation framework. This compelling backstory has clearly resonated across the community, attracting significant participation and enthusiasm. The breadth of engagement signals genuine interest in the project's fundamentals, not just surface-level hype. The campaign outcome demonstrates how solid market narratives, when paired with tangible mechanics, can drive meaningful community activation and sustained attention in a competitive Web3 landscape.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LowCapGemHunter
· 01-18 08:03
2.5B valuation sounds impressive, but at the end of the day, it's all about the rankings. Most are median performers.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysMissingTops
· 01-16 11:49
NGL, this narrative is really on point. The $2.5B valuation is explained so well that no wonder so many people are drawn in to play.
View OriginalReply0
GraphGuru
· 01-16 11:29
The $2.5B valuation is quite bold, but the scattered ranking indicates that there aren't actually that many true believers.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropBlackHole
· 01-15 11:01
The leaderboard looks just so-so. How many people can really get a taste of the meat?
View OriginalReply0
Lonely_Validator
· 01-15 10:58
2.5B valuation sounds impressive, but how did all those people in the middle of the rankings get there... Are they really all about faith, or just for the fun of it?
View OriginalReply0
WalletWhisperer
· 01-15 10:55
the mid-tier clustering here's actually telling—whale psychology doesn't accumulate linearly, it patterns. 2.5B valuation as narrative anchor? textbook behavioral herding. watching address profiling data would reveal the *real* statistical significance beneath this engagement theater.
Reply0
ProofOfNothing
· 01-15 10:41
A 2.5B valuation sounds good, but I'm not on the leaderboard...
The $SIXR campaign wrapped up recently, and the leaderboard results tell an interesting story. In the 30-day rankings—likely the metric that'll carry the most weight—participants are spread across a wide range, with positions in the mid-tier range reflecting the competitive nature of the initiative.
What's remarkable is the momentum behind $SIXR, particularly given the project narrative built on a substantial 2.5B valuation framework. This compelling backstory has clearly resonated across the community, attracting significant participation and enthusiasm. The breadth of engagement signals genuine interest in the project's fundamentals, not just surface-level hype. The campaign outcome demonstrates how solid market narratives, when paired with tangible mechanics, can drive meaningful community activation and sustained attention in a competitive Web3 landscape.