I recently came across an analysis article about the crypto market that’s worth spending ten minutes to read carefully. It can significantly enhance your understanding of the current market conditions.



The core insight is quite sobering: after Bitcoin’s mainstreaming, the classic bull market script from the past has become completely ineffective.

Let’s first look at the past year’s institutional entry, the integration of TradFi, Circle’s IPO, and political figures’ endorsements—according to the old playbook, these should all be typical opening sequences for a high-beta bull market. But what’s the reality? Volatility has collapsed entirely, and BTC’s performance in 2025 has actually lagged behind gold, US stocks, and even A-shares. It’s almost like all the scripts were correct, but the ending is frustrating.

Even more bizarre is the emergence of a historic split in the capital structure. On-chain spot ETFs (DAT) are buying aggressively, while CEXs are selling into rallies. What about retail investors? They’re largely absent; exchange traffic has plummeted noticeably, and even Korean retail investors have shifted to betting on the stock market.

The real structural buyers are actually DAT funds. Through NAV premium arbitrage, they’ve formed a positive feedback loop of “buy more as prices rise,” increasing their BTC holdings by 890,000 coins over two years. Interestingly, non-institutional funds dominate within ETFs, while hedge funds have already been quietly reducing their positions.

On the sell side, the players are also very aggressive. OG-level whales are quite clever, gracefully exiting through “paper Bitcoin” (like spot funds such as IBIT). What about miners? They’re no longer just mining; they’re shifting towards AI computing power, with an expected 20% of mining capacity to flow into AI by 2027.

The biggest impact of this is that the previous “four-year halving cycle” analytical framework has completely failed. What we now need to focus on is the dual-axis driver of “macro liquidity + DAT/ETF premium.” The key variables in the future will surface one by one in 2026: Will DTCC truly implement on-chain settlement? Can the AI narrative withstand scrutiny? Will BTC decouple from altcoins?

Interestingly, Bitcoin’s mainstreaming is not the end of the bull market but rather the “coming of age” for the entire crypto industry. Institutions are chasing the financial attributes of paper Bitcoin, which is unavoidable. But the true vitality still lies in the native on-chain consensus—those old stories, community cohesion, and the most genuine dissemination power.

For small and medium investors, there’s no need to copy institutional allocation logic. Instead, those community-driven native assets—like various Meme coins—may be able to develop entirely independent market trends based on genuine community engagement and recognition, especially in the new market landscape where BTC decouples from altcoins. After all, the original purpose of cryptocurrencies is distributed consensus; institutions can define financialized value, but they can never define the wild vitality of the community.
BTC-2,71%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MintMastervip
· 01-17 11:36
Really, the collective disappearance of retail investors is something worth pondering carefully. The way Paper Bitcoin is withdrawing is quite clever; why didn't I think of that? When it comes to meme coins, there's some real insight—community is the real hard currency. Now we really need to look at the market from a different perspective; the halving cycle is already outdated. DAT's recent moves are truly impressive; 890,000 BTC can still be played like this. Are miners shifting to AI computing power? Not likely; it still feels like we should wait and see. Institutions can define value but can't define community—that's the point. Retail investors have gone into stocks, huh? That's really heartbreaking. I'm actually more optimistic about projects with genuine communities—things that institutions can't play. So, the future depends on these variables in 2026; the move by DTCC is very crucial.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBarbervip
· 01-16 17:39
Just say it, institutions are cashing out with paper Bitcoin, while retail investors are instead playing Meme coins. The logic is incredible. --- DAT is buying aggressively, but BTC still underperforms gold. That’s almost like saying that no matter how good the fundamentals are, they can’t save the boredom after mainstream adoption. --- Miners have all shifted to AI computing power, indicating that this circle has really changed. The halving cycle and this old relic can go to hell. --- Why do I feel that in the end, the community’s wild vitality is the most valuable? When institutions can’t define it, that’s the biggest thing. --- 89 million BTC are going into ETFs, but CEXs are selling like crazy. Is this the institutions getting smarter or retail investors collectively giving up? --- Wow, it’s really incredible. All the scripts have the right ending, but it still feels awkward. That’s the price of Bitcoin’s mainstreaming. --- The term “paper Bitcoin” is used brilliantly. OGs’ “elegant exit” basically means they’re just cutting us off. --- The split between on-chain spot and CEXs is so obvious. It feels like the industry is really undergoing some fundamental change. --- Korean retail investors have all gone to gamble in the stock market. That’s the most heartbreaking signal, showing that the circle is indeed losing popularity.
View OriginalReply0
ForkThisDAOvip
· 01-16 02:06
It's really frustrating. The promised institutional entry into the bull market has instead underperformed gold, and I can't really take it anymore. Whales are secretly using paper Bitcoin to exit, retail investors have already left, and now it's just ETFs frantically accumulating shares. What kind of market is this? Meme coins are actually more resilient? There's some truth to that. Community-driven projects are indeed more reliable than institutional paper values. Miners have all shifted to AI computing power. Mining might really be changing, no wonder things have felt a bit different these past two years. The halving cycle framework has completely failed. That's a bold statement—let's see how 2026 plays out.
View OriginalReply0
MevTearsvip
· 01-15 10:53
Wow, this analysis is really solid, the old playbook is completely dead, now it's all about how the ETF plays out. Retail investors are really gone, they all went all-in on the stock market lol. This time it's different, meme coins actually have a chance at independent movement? Community is king man. Institutions are playing paper bitcoin, we're playing the real thing, that's interesting. 2026 is when things get interesting, whether DTCC can actually go on-chain is still up in the air.
View OriginalReply0
TrustMeBrovip
· 01-15 10:52
No, this analysis has some substance... BTC underperforming A-shares, how frustrating Are retail investors really all gone? Why do I feel like my friends' group is still going all-in They’re buying crazily on ETFs, but hedge funds are secretly reducing their positions... This is outrageous, who’s really making money and who’s losing? Meme coins having their own independent market? Sounds good, but can it really decouple... or is it just another game of hot potato? Mainstreaming ≠ bull market... That hits hard, but it really does feel that way Miners have all shifted to AI, so who will ensure BTC’s security? 2026 is the real showtime, holding coins now is just betting on whether these stories will come true or not Can institutions define the community? Ha, institutions have the money, in the end, they still call the shots
View OriginalReply0
BTCBeliefStationvip
· 01-15 10:48
妈的,这波分析真的戳到我了,散户真的全跑了 DAT那帮人靠溢价疯狂吸筹,咱们还在那琢磨减半周期,属实落伍了 ETF非机构主导?那对冲基金呢,早减仓了呗,笑死 纸比特这手法绝了,直接优雅退场,我就是学不会这份气质 矿工都要跑AI去了,挖矿这事儿还有什么盼头吗 2026才是看头,BTC真要和山寨脱钩,Meme币才是主菜吧 讲真,咱们这种散户还是看社区的东西靠谱,机构玩不了这套野性生命力 机构定义金融价值行呗,但社区那股劲儿它们永远硬不了这份"狂"
Reply0
TokenomicsTherapistvip
· 01-15 10:47
View OriginalReply0
TestnetNomadvip
· 01-15 10:38
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingersFrontrunvip
· 01-15 10:34
Damn, this analysis is really fierce. Retail investors collectively abstaining is truly outrageous. Institutions are playing with paper Bitcoin, while we play with real consensus. This logic is quite interesting. BTC underperforming A-shares? This script is indeed brilliantly written haha. Over on DAT, there's crazy buying while CEX is selling. The capital structure is really split. The halving cycle framework is dead. Looking at macro liquidity now, no wonder everything feels ineffective. Miners have all shifted to mining AI, this transition is way too fast. The move to phase out paper Bitcoin is indeed elegant. Old whales are just smart. Once the hypothesis of de-coupling from clones is established, Meme coins might actually have a chance? Consensus > Financial attributes, I love hearing this. Institutions can't define the wildness—that's truly the truth.
View OriginalReply0
TokenCreatorOPvip
· 01-15 10:28
Yeah, this article really hits the nail on the head. Retail investors have truly been completely abandoned. Underperforming gold and underperforming US stocks is indeed outrageous; it feels like the entire narrative has collapsed. It seems I need to change my approach. The story of coins might really be unsustainable. Meme is the antidote? The community's wild vitality, not bad. Institutions are playing with paper Bitcoin, so let's play with real consensus. Miners are all embracing AI now; mining is getting more and more competitive. The DAT positive feedback loop is interesting, but honestly, it's still a game for institutions. The collective absence of retail investors is the most heartbreaking part; even Korean traders have left. It's really hard to say whether the variables in 2026 can turn things around.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin