2026-01-15 10:21:57

The most regrettable moment in short-term trading on the Sui chain: prices rise, but profits are mostly eaten away by slippage.

Recently, I came across an interesting approach—redesigning DEX using the DLMM (Dynamic Liquidity Market Maker) model. The core logic is straightforward: the slippage problem in traditional AMMs stems from liquidity dispersion. The new algorithm improves capital efficiency by concentrating within a narrower price range.

From practical experience, this type of solution performs quite well on the Sui chain. Zero-slippage trading within a narrow range is no longer just theoretical—it's approaching the smoothness of centralized exchanges, with a noticeable difference for users accustomed to CEX trading experiences.

Regarding project background, it has received $2 million in funding support, with daily trading volume surpassing tens of millions. These indicators reflect growing market recognition of this liquidity solution.

Essentially, this is not just about slippage optimization but about DEX advancing simultaneously in capital efficiency and trading experience—precisely the direction of on-chain exchange evolution.

SUI0,15%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WalletDetective

· 01-18 08:47

To be honest, this DLMM sounds good but I still have some doubts... Can zero slippage really be sustained? Those who previously said they would revolutionize AMM, what happened in the end? Constantly shouting innovation, but user experience is still poor. I'll wait and see if Sui can really surpass CEX based on the data, anyone can boast. Wait, when was this 2 million funding? Feels a bit off to have such a funding scale now... Actually, the key is liquidity. Without real depth, no matter how much you optimize, it's all just superficial.

View OriginalReply0

SerumSurfer

· 01-15 21:24

It's another issue with slippage. To be honest, I was afraid of getting scammed... But the DLMM system really opened my eyes; it's not as laggy as I thought.

View OriginalReply0

gm_or_ngmi

· 01-15 10:49

Slippage eating into profits is really heartbreaking, and what you said is right. But can DLMM really solve this? It all depends on real trading data speaking for itself. Speaking of 2 million in financing and tens of millions in daily trading volume, it sounds impressive, but could this just be a fleeting hype? The Sui ecosystem keeps launching new things every day. Which one is truly the next-generation DEX? I still need to observe a bit more. Matching the smoothness of CEX really hits the pain point; finally, someone is taking user experience seriously. But I need to actually trade to draw a conclusion; just looking at financing and trading volume data isn't convincing enough. Narrow-range zero slippage? That name sounds like old wine in a new bottle. Let’s wait until I’ve actually used it.

View OriginalReply0

governance_lurker

· 01-15 10:44

Slippage... I've seen too many people regret not using a good DEX when they got liquidated. Now there's a zero-slippage solution, and you're still hesitating? That's just ridiculous.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedTwice

· 01-15 10:35

Slippage is really a chronic issue, feeling like the gains are completely eaten away... DLMM is quite something, but I still want to see the real data before making any judgments.

View OriginalReply0

MagicBean

· 01-15 10:32

滑点真的绝了，明明看涨了结果到手才一半，一度以为自己是不是算数有问题

Reply0

EthSandwichHero

· 01-15 10:30

Damn, finally someone is talking about this. Slippage is really crazy. Watching the price hit the daily limit and ending up with just a half-life in hand. DLMM's system is indeed awesome. I've also been experimenting with it on Sui recently, and it feels no different from centralized exchanges. 2 million in financing daily trading worth tens of millions. What does this data indicate? It shows that everyone has been messed up by the slippage on traditional DEXs.

View OriginalReply0