A leading compliant platform adopts a tough stance as a bargaining chip, which makes logical sense. However, if the market structure reform bill ultimately stalls, this move could become a regret spanning many years. The game of chess between exchanges and regulators has always been a double-edged sword—firm short-term positions may gain negotiation advantages, but in the long run, they could cause the market to miss the window for structural reforms.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCriervip
· 01-17 17:17
Currently going all-in, but if the bill falls through, it's all over. This move is a bit risky.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmesvip
· 01-15 10:09
Bet too aggressively. If the bill really gets stalled, this hand will be completely ruined.
View OriginalReply0
just_another_fishvip
· 01-15 10:06
Betting on the market reform window period to exchange for negotiation chips, this move is a bit playing with fire.
View OriginalReply0
SingleForYearsvip
· 01-15 10:05
Being too stubborn backfires and ends up shooting yourself in the foot. If you bet on the wrong bill, you'll truly become a laughingstock.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperervip
· 01-15 09:53
Gambler's mentality, this move might have been a failure
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin