2026-01-15 09:36:42

A certain public chain ecosystem is undergoing a strategic adjustment: shifting from a purely platform-oriented approach to playing the roles of both a holding company and a super incubator.

The confidence behind this shift comes from several key assets they hold. First is the PoL monetizable incentive mechanism, followed by native DeFi products like Bend and HONEY as ecosystem leverage, plus the cash reserves accumulated in the DAT treasury. The management team itself has backgrounds in both traditional finance and technology, bringing experience capable of delivering results.

The crucial change lies in the shift in resource allocation strategy—no longer spreading resources widely, but focusing firepower. They plan to commit all their chips to 3-5 carefully selected tracks, which must meet several conditions: the projects must be capable, have real-world revenue models, and most importantly, be able to feed back into and drive ecosystem growth. This focused strategy has become the choice for many mature ecosystems in the current Web3 competition.

POL1,02%

HONEY0,37%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

rekt_but_resilient

· 01-18 08:18

Pushing into 3-5 tracks? It feels like those all-in projects from the past two years. Why is it happening again this time?

View OriginalReply0

CryptoFortuneTeller

· 01-16 19:52

After playing for so long, I still like to see the ecosystem side really dare to shrink the front line, not afraid of being criticized. Betting on 3-5 tracks sounds controlling... Can they stick with it? The monetization aspect of PoL is interesting, but I'm worried it might just be the most eye-catching part in the PPT. Can this round really incubate projects that can compete? Let's wait and see.

View OriginalReply0

ser_ngmi

· 01-16 19:24

This kind of betting on a few niche tracks, frankly, is about betting that a few projects can lift the entire ecosystem, but the risks are also quite high... --- PoL+DeFi products+cash reserves, it looks like the foundation is indeed solid, just worried about the execution ability keeping up --- 3-5 carefully selected tracks? Sounds good, but the key is what is chosen; one bad project can drag down the whole --- Transforming from a platform to a holding company + incubator, this role switch is quite interesting, essentially playing both athlete and referee --- The real-world income model has high requirements; most projects probably can't achieve it at all --- The management team has a background in traditional finance; whether they can come up with something different this time depends on them --- Focusing firepower vs. casting a wide net, this logic seems clever, but it also means the risk of going all in

View OriginalReply0

ConsensusDissenter

· 01-15 10:06

Bet on 3-5 tracks? Sounds like going all in, did I bet wrong? --- The PoL incentive mechanism being monetized sounds good, but I’m just worried it’s another paper tiger. --- The term "real income model" is everywhere now; everyone has talked about it. --- From platform to incubator, it all comes down to whether the project is good and whether the team is reliable. --- How much cash reserves does the treasury have? That’s the key to how long it can last. --- Focusing all efforts sounds exciting, but I’m afraid if you miss one, you’ll lose everything. --- Can Bend and HONEY really become the ecosystem’s leverage? I don’t think so. --- The management team has a good cross-industry background, but the Web3 approach is really different. --- Another talk about selected tracks, everyone emphasizes focus, but how many have actually succeeded? --- Reinforcing ecosystem growth? First, ask if there’s real growth now. --- I’ve heard this logic several times last year; why does it seem like few actually achieve it? --- Betting on 3-5 tracks, making such a big gamble now, it’s really a bit extravagant.

View OriginalReply0

quietly_staking

· 01-15 10:05

It really seems like things are getting serious, no longer just talk? --- Focusing on 3-5 tracks, this mature approach is being used by ecosystems everywhere; it all depends on execution. --- With cash reserves and PoL incentives, they might really create something, provided they choose the right tracks. --- Both focus and feedback, in the end, it still depends on whether the project can be implemented; no matter how good the hype, it's useless. --- Switching from platform to controlling shareholder? I understand this logic, it's like stepping into the game yourself, and the risk isn't small. --- Bend and HONEY need to prove their worth for this position; otherwise, it's all just empty talk. --- The real revenue model has been a bottleneck for many projects, but any data-driven approach is worth a look. --- Feels like learning the tricks of traditional VC; can Web3 come up with new ideas? I'm a bit curious. --- The treasury has confidence but also risks burning through funds quickly; I hope they aren't another rollercoaster ride. --- 3-5 tracks, is this a serious selection or being forced to choose? Anyway, I remain cautious.

View OriginalReply0

MoonWaterDroplets

· 01-15 09:59

It sounds like they want to learn the Solana gameplay, but I don't know if they can withstand the bear market. --- PoL+Bend+cash reserves, the card looks pretty good, but the key is whether the team is reliable. --- Another story of going all-in on several tracks, if you bet right, you take off; if you bet wrong, what then? --- The real income model depends on the specific project; no matter how much hype a project has, it's all useless. --- From platform to incubator, ultimately, it's about finding projects that can generate revenue, which is quite challenging. --- Focusing on 3-5 tracks with concentrated firepower sounds great, but whether risks can be managed well during execution is a question. --- I just want to know which tracks they chose... give me some info. --- This focused strategy sounds good, but whether it can outperform the overwhelming big ecosystems remains to be seen. --- The DAT treasury's funds are not enough to play around in this wave of market conditions. --- Talking about ecosystem feedback and growth sounds simple, but in practice, there are many pitfalls.

View OriginalReply0

ReverseTradingGuru

· 01-15 09:58

Ha, finally someone has explained this clearly. Focusing all firepower is indeed impressive, much better than those who want to do everything but end up with mediocre results. --- PoL + cash reserves, this combination does have some substance. The key is whether they can really pick out the 3-5 projects that can truly compete. --- Revenue model? In Web3? Why do I feel like this is just another pretty phrase... --- Holding + incubator, sounds good, but I wonder if it will just turn into another form of VC exploiting investors. --- I'm actually interested in seeing the real-world revenue part, not just paper numbers. --- I can understand the idea of shifting from platform to incubator, but the prerequisite is really having the eye to identify talent. --- Betting on 3-5 tracks? If you ask me, that's just gambling—if you bet right, you fly high; if you bet wrong, you just lie flat. --- How long can DAT Treasury's reserves last? That's the real question, not just having money means success.

View OriginalReply0

FarmHopper

· 01-15 09:54

Focusing is the key; the old approach of casting a wide net should have been changed long ago. --- PoL + Bend + cash reserves, this combination is pretty good; the key is how to play it. --- Oh no, betting on 3-5 tracks? You need a real income model to back it up. --- Finally, someone understands that burning money to build an ecosystem is outdated. --- Regarding a real income model, that's correct; otherwise, it's all just castles in the air. --- Holding company + incubator dual roles, is this idea considered new? --- DAT Treasury needs to manage its accounts well this time; don't throw money around again. --- The phrase "feeding back into the ecosystem" sounds nice, but how to actually operate it? --- Management team with traditional financial backgrounds; this is still a rare breed in Web3. --- Focusing firepower vs. casting a wide net, it seems like a forced adjustment.

View OriginalReply0

NotGonnaMakeIt

· 01-15 09:37

It sounds like another all-in story. If you bet right, you'll take off; if you bet wrong... you all know. --- PoL plus DeFi products plus cash reserves sound very attractive, but can it really be achieved? --- Focusing on strategy and 3-5 tracks, why does it feel like every public chain says the same thing? --- The key is whether that team can truly deliver; otherwise, even the best stories are pointless. --- I just want to know which competitor these cards are against. Are they really that strong? --- Replenishing ecosystem growth? Let's see if they can survive first. --- Betting on selected tracks. This time, won't it be another five dead tracks? --- Interesting, but isn't it too late to talk about this now? --- Transforming from a platform to a holding company and super incubator sounds grand, but how about execution? --- A real-world income model is a good standard, but who defines what is truly real? --- The treasury cash reserves are so highly regarded, indicating that project teams are unwilling to invest proactively.

View OriginalReply0