2026-01-15 09:29:18

Recently, I noticed a phenomenon worth discussing. Some protocols earn profits but are reluctant to distribute them to the community. Think about it, if a project is truly working hard for the future, why would it be unwilling to share the rewards with participants?

Honestly, this approach is a bit disheartening. Either the project team is hoarding tokens, or there is no clear distribution plan, or they are just stalling for time waiting for the right moment. Whatever the case, it indicates one thing: such protocols may not be genuinely building but are playing a numbers game.

The performance of BTC and ETH has already proven what real value looks like—market liquidity is sufficient, and ecosystem participants can receive tangible returns. In contrast, projects that hide their intentions seem particularly suspicious. When choosing projects, this detail is very important.

BTC0,42%

ETH1,65%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ThesisInvestor

· 01-18 09:00

Really, these project teams just talk big and disappear after making money. Their distribution plans are all crap. The consensus has collapsed, and they still want to trick us into buying? Laughable. Why have BTC and ETH survived until now? Because they are fair to everyone in the ecosystem. Other coins should learn from them.

View OriginalReply0

MindsetExpander

· 01-15 09:56

Really, a project that can't even share basic value and immediately talks about ecosystem construction— isn't that just nonsense? I've seen too many tricks of project teams hoarding tokens. Basically, they just want to cut the last wave. Protocols that don't distribute profits... I just pass on them. Such red flags are too obvious. Why can BTC and ETH survive so long? Because they are transparent enough. Can't other project teams learn from this? I totally agree with choosing projects based on their distribution mechanisms. Better to miss out than to touch those shady ones. The most hated are the project teams that make big money quietly. Participants need to wake up.

View OriginalReply0

liquiditea_sipper

· 01-15 09:56

Well... to be honest, I get annoyed when I see those self-serving protocols. What era are we in still playing the game of hoarding tokens? Genuine projects have long since clearly defined their distribution mechanisms; BTC and ETH are living examples. Those hidden things, nine times out of ten, are not worth much. So, don't be fooled by sweet talk. You have to see how they actually distribute real money.

View OriginalReply0

Tokenomics911

· 01-15 09:55

No profit sharing? That's just playing dirty, and you still dare to say you're building? Basically, it's just about wanting to harvest the early adopters and cash out when the opportunity comes. Why are BTC and ETH valuable? Because they give back real silver and gold to holders. Some projects only talk about stories, and when they make money, they go silent. I would never touch such coins even if I die. These kinds of projects will definitely blow up sooner or later, remember that. --- Those teams secretly hoarding tokens really think the community is a fool. Why not transparent distribution? They must be hiding some bad plans. --- If profits are not shared, just say so directly. Why bother making up a "long-term plan" that makes me want to vomit? The next Luna will come from these kinds of scammers. --- Wait, are there really projects that earn profits and are willing to share with the community? Or am I just investing in trash?

View OriginalReply0

DogeBachelor

· 01-15 09:49

They just want to cut the leeks, not a penny spared, and still have the nerve to talk about ecosystem construction. Someone should have exposed this long ago. They tell stories every day, turn around and hoard coins, it's hilarious. If there's no distribution, don't blame users for leaving. Look at how united the BTC community is, and then look at you. You still want to attract developers? Understand the dividend mechanism first before trying to fool people. It feels like gambling on the next bull market, not taking early users seriously at all. I would just pass on projects like this. Many project teams are purely capital-driven, with no real faith. Any clear-sighted person can see that no distribution = no trust in the long-term value, they don't even believe in themselves.

View OriginalReply0

WalletDivorcer

· 01-15 09:45

Basically, it's just about hiding in the shadows. I will directly pass on any agreement that doesn't share the wealth. Projects that hide things are the most suspicious. I've seen too many of these tricks. The truly reliable ones have already shared with the community. Still hoarding? Then just wait to be cut. These projects are just wasting time. Do they really think we can't see through? Whether they distribute dividends or not, you can tell if they are genuinely committed to development. It's obvious. They keep the profits under wraps. Why should I believe you? Bitcoin and Ethereum have reached today because of real liquidity. Contrast that with these... haha. No distribution means they lack confidence. I wouldn't dare to touch projects that lack confidence. Personality and distribution mechanisms are linked. Now I really understand. Feels like they're waiting for some opportunity to make a quick kill.

View OriginalReply0