2026-01-15 09:27:10

Looking back at Dash's development path, the privacy feature of mixing coins once became very popular. However, when viewed today, its underlying technology stack appears somewhat outdated, and its privacy protection strength is noticeably inferior to top industry solutions.

In contrast, Dusk adopts zero-knowledge proofs, a more cutting-edge direction in cryptography. This solution not only offers stronger privacy but also has a key advantage—native support for compliant auditing. For traditional financial institutions, this means they can achieve privacy protection while meeting regulatory requirements, greatly reducing concerns about on-chain compliance.

After entering the RWA era, pure privacy features are no longer sufficient to attract institutional capital. Traditional finance needs solutions that are private, compliant, secure, and auditable. From this perspective, Dash's technical approach indeed lacks competitiveness, while newer privacy paradigms like zero-knowledge proofs are becoming the new industry trend.

DASH-0,99%

DUSK2,97%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DataBartender

· 01-18 04:17

Dash is indeed a bit of an old-timer; zero-knowledge proofs are the future. Zero-knowledge technology is truly powerful, providing both privacy and auditability. Traditional finance is already adopting this approach. RWA (Real-World Assets) must be compliant; pure privacy is no longer enough. Dash's mixing technology should have been upgraded long ago. It does seem a bit outdated now. Privacy + compliance—that's what institutions want. No wonder Dash is no longer popular. Zero-knowledge proofs are really the ultimate solution, offering privacy while satisfying regulators. The point about compliance and auditing is spot on; that's exactly the pain point for traditional finance. It seems the privacy coin route needs to change. Hiding alone isn't enough; it also needs to learn how to cooperate.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainHolmes

· 01-18 03:48

Dash's tech stack is really outdated, zero-knowledge proofs are indeed more appealing --- After the RWA boom, privacy + compliance are the keys to success, Dash indeed didn't keep up --- Dusk's advantage in compliance auditing is truly outstanding, traditional finance relies on this --- Mixing coins for privacy is outdated, who still cares about simple privacy features --- Institutional capital doesn't care how strong your privacy is, the key is passing the review --- Zero-knowledge proofs are gradually becoming industry standard, Dash has been completely overtaken --- Can privacy and compliance be satisfied at the same time? Dusk's approach really works --- To put it simply, Dash chose the wrong technical direction, and it's too late to change now

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterXM

· 01-15 09:53

Dash's tech stack is indeed a bit outdated, and the mixing methods have long been obsolete. The combination of zero-knowledge proofs with compliant audits truly addresses the pain points of institutions. In the RWA era, privacy alone isn't enough; compatibility with regulations is more attractive.

View OriginalReply0

Gm_Gn_Merchant

· 01-15 09:49

Dash, this old-timer really should retire. The mixed coin gameplay now looks like tools from the Stone Age. ZK proofs are the future, offering privacy and compliance all in one. That's what institutions are looking for.

View OriginalReply0

AlphaBrain

· 01-15 09:49

Dash's tech stack should have been updated long ago; zero-knowledge proofs are the way to go. Privacy + compliance combo, do traditional financial institutions adopt this set? ZK proof is really gaining momentum; Dash feels a bit outdated. In the RWA era, compliance is the key to competitiveness; pure privacy solutions are already outdated. Dusk's approach is correct—privacy and auditability are both needed for institutions to feel comfortable on the blockchain. Honestly, Dash's mixing solution isn't as attractive anymore; times have changed. Does zero-knowledge proof naturally support auditing? This is what traditional finance wants. It feels like Dash is still doing things from ten years ago, a bit out of sync.

View OriginalReply0

RealYieldWizard

· 01-15 09:40

Dash's old technology indeed needs to be phased out; zero-knowledge proofs are the future direction. Privacy + compliance is truly the trend; institutional capital is all in on this. Dusk is definitely on the right track; the gameplay in the RWA era is completely different. Mixing coins? Ha, that's from the previous era. Zero-knowledge proofs are gaining popularity; Dash really has no chance. Compliance audits are indeed a necessity for RWA; Dusk has a broader landscape. No matter how old technology is optimized, it can't keep up with new paradigms; isn't this the fate of Web3? Institutions want both privacy and compliance; pure privacy has long been obsolete.

View OriginalReply0

CoconutWaterBoy

· 01-15 09:34

Dash is a bit awkward this time. Privacy solutions become outdated quickly; zero-knowledge proofs are truly the way forward. I'm a bit curious, can Dusk's compliance + privacy solution really be implemented, or is it just talk on paper? After RWA becomes mainstream, privacy coins that only hide won't be in demand anymore. They need to both hide and allow regulators to audit, so Dash's approach does seem a bit old. Monero is probably quietly celebrating. The game of privacy coins is becoming increasingly complex. The combination of zero-knowledge proofs indeed caught Dash off guard, but whether it can be truly recognized by institutions remains to be seen.

View OriginalReply0