The recent push by the U.S. Senate for the "CLARITY Act" has become a focal point in the cryptocurrency market. This legislation is seen as a key measure to address the regulatory dilemmas of digital assets, with its core aim being to clarify the boundaries of authority between the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission).



The innovative aspect of the bill lies in introducing the new concept of "auxiliary assets." By assessing the level of decentralization and control rights, it determines whether a token should fall under securities regulation or commodities regulation. This classification framework, combined with a phased disclosure mechanism, provides a clearer compliance transition path for crypto projects.

However, the bill has also sparked intense controversy. The biggest disagreement revolves around the yield mechanisms of stablecoins. Traditional financial institutions worry that stablecoins with yield features are essentially akin to deposit-taking, which could weaken banks' lending functions and pose systemic risks. Meanwhile, the crypto industry argues that such incentive mechanisms are more similar to conventional fintech designs, and restricting yield distribution could stifle industry innovation.

Coinbase's stance is particularly representative— the exchange publicly opposes the bill, citing concerns including the potential ban on tokenized stocks, weakening of the CFTC's market position, and strict restrictions on stablecoin yields. This marks a clear internal divide within the industry.

Supporters' positions are also clear. They believe the "CLARITY Act" can inject regulatory certainty into the market, strengthen anti-money laundering measures, protect investors' rights, and help integrate the crypto financial system into the U.S. regulatory framework.

From an implementation perspective, even if the bill passes as scheduled, it will require extensive subsequent rulemaking and inter-agency coordination. Industry estimates suggest full implementation may take until 2027 to 2029.

Overall, this bill reflects the ongoing struggle in the U.S. to promote financial innovation while balancing regulatory authority and protecting the existing financial system. Its final form will have a profound impact on the governance of the global crypto industry.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SolidityJestervip
· 01-18 08:13
Another bunch of regulatory bickering. Ultimately, it's just traditional finance fearing we will steal their business. Coinbase is right to oppose. This bill makes stablecoins so complicated that it will really kill innovation. Only coming into effect in 2027? By then, the market will have gone through several cycles. That's how slow the regulation is. Having yields on stablecoins isn't a form of competitiveness. If the bank's lending function is weakened, that's your own problem. So, who exactly regulates—SEC or CFTC? This bill is just a fight among insiders. Regulatory certainty sounds good, but it could also be a shackle that traps innovators. Another seemingly rational compromise, but in reality, nobody is satisfied with it.
View OriginalReply0
DegenMcsleeplessvip
· 01-18 07:53
Coinbase's opposition fully explains the issue... If this bill really passes, will we have to wait until 2027? By then, the bull market will probably be over haha Here we go again, a tug-of-war between regulation and innovation. Banks fear stablecoins will steal their business, and we fear being suffocated. It’s endless. Basically, they want to put us in a cage. On paper, the compliance path looks clear, but in reality, it’s just various restrictions. How likely is this thing to pass... After hearing so many "key bills," they all seem to end up as just paper talk. Stablecoin yields are indeed prone to problems, but banning them so harshly is too extreme. Isn’t that just the art of compromise? Wait, can they really coordinate SEC and CFTC? Can these two agencies clearly divide their powers? I don’t believe it. Implementation in 2027? What should we do before then... This gap might actually make things more chaotic.
View OriginalReply0
PumpAnalystvip
· 01-15 09:56
Hmm, another bill that won't be implemented until 2027. This pace is definitely the rhythm of the whales pushing the market up, giving everyone time to speculate on expectations. It's funny that Coinbase opposes it. The exchange that usually cuts retail investors the harshest is now also shouting "protect innovation"? But this wave of stablecoin yield restrictions is indeed noticeable. Traditional finance folks are truly scared; they can't keep their jobs at the banks. It's bearish, but if this classification framework really gets implemented, short-term token valuations won't be affected, and technically, we need to watch the support levels. Before you get on board, everyone should consider their risk management and not be blinded by the hype of market rallies. I've seen many disputes over bills like this. In the end, the final clauses will definitely be influenced by whose lobbying team is more aggressive. Don't expect any real "clarity."
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketHustlervip
· 01-15 09:52
It's another bunch of regulatory topics. After all the talk, it still won't be implemented until 2027, and this pace is really dragging things down. Regarding stablecoin yields, banks are just scared. Isn't it just threatening their livelihood? It's normal for Coinbase to oppose it; exchanges naturally want to protect their interests. But to be fair, having certainty is definitely better than this current ambiguous state. Wait, will tokenized stocks really be banned? That would mean another round of fuss.
View OriginalReply0
BasementAlchemistvip
· 01-15 09:51
Does CB really dare to oppose? Probably just thinking about their own Lido business. By 2027, what's the point of bikes? By then, the coins will be gone. Stablecoin yields are always a double-edged sword; traditional finance is just afraid we’ll take their jobs. Just hearing "clarify the boundaries of authority" makes it clear they'll be arguing for years.
View OriginalReply0
FudVaccinatorvip
· 01-15 09:42
Coinbase opposes it, so this bill is probably dead.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin