#比特币2026年行情展望 Testing the profit differences between two holding strategies is actually very simple. Take $ETH and a popular token as an example, establish two test accounts: one account with 100U in spot holdings, and another account where 100U worth of tokens and 100U worth of ETH are directly invested into a liquidity pool.
When withdrawing liquidity after one cycle, compare the profit data of the two accounts—how much the spot holdings earned, and how much in fees and incentives were earned from mining. The numbers will tell you the truth.
This comparison experiment actually guides the subsequent pool allocation strategies for the foundation. Whenever a bear market arrives or the foundation announces a liquidity incentive plan, you will have already validated which participation method offers the best ROI based on historical data. Instead of guessing and following the trend, let the actual performance of $BTC and other mainstream coins and various tokens speak for themselves. Data-driven decision-making is the fundamental rule for surviving in liquidity mining.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenRationEater
· 1h ago
Selling the data-driven approach again, mining fees were already ridiculously thin in this bull market. The real profit still comes from the surge in the secondary market. Is this data comparison interesting?
View OriginalReply0
IntrovertMetaverse
· 9h ago
Unbelievable, I did this before, spot trading was completely crushed by mining...
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-e19e9c10
· 10h ago
That's right, running your own data is much better than just talking big. Who still trusts the promises made in live streams these days?
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlice
· 10h ago
That's true, but reality is often more brutal than data. Gas fees can drain half your life away in an instant.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeSobber
· 10h ago
Haha, it's the same old story. I've tried it long ago. Spot trading and staking mining are being manipulated, staying holding coins is the simplest.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-5854de8b
· 10h ago
Does this testing method allow a comparison between spot trading and mining? The impermanent loss is directly calculated as a death combination...
View OriginalReply0
TommyTeacher
· 10h ago
Wow, someone finally said this. I've been doing it this way for a long time. Spot trading is indeed more profitable than mining.
View OriginalReply0
TeaTimeTrader
· 10h ago
That's right, I did that before, and as a result, the data showed huge discrepancies... Liquidity mining looks highly profitable but is full of pitfalls.
View OriginalReply0
TopBuyerBottomSeller
· 10h ago
Data-driven decision-making sounds a bit regretful, doesn't it? Last year, I was cut off based on this very logic.
#比特币2026年行情展望 Testing the profit differences between two holding strategies is actually very simple. Take $ETH and a popular token as an example, establish two test accounts: one account with 100U in spot holdings, and another account where 100U worth of tokens and 100U worth of ETH are directly invested into a liquidity pool.
When withdrawing liquidity after one cycle, compare the profit data of the two accounts—how much the spot holdings earned, and how much in fees and incentives were earned from mining. The numbers will tell you the truth.
This comparison experiment actually guides the subsequent pool allocation strategies for the foundation. Whenever a bear market arrives or the foundation announces a liquidity incentive plan, you will have already validated which participation method offers the best ROI based on historical data. Instead of guessing and following the trend, let the actual performance of $BTC and other mainstream coins and various tokens speak for themselves. Data-driven decision-making is the fundamental rule for surviving in liquidity mining.