A major crypto exchange CEO has publicly stated opposition to the proposed crypto market structure bill in its current form. According to his position, the existing legislative framework poses more risks than benefits for the industry—essentially arguing that inadequate regulation could do more harm than leaving the status quo unchanged. This reflects growing concerns within the crypto sector about how future regulatory frameworks might shape market development and institutional participation.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHunter007vip
· 01-18 00:27
Here we go again with this? Insufficient regulation is actually more dangerous than no regulation at all. I really can't hold back my disbelief at this logic.
View OriginalReply0
NightAirdroppervip
· 01-17 18:23
Yanzhi Laoge is back to showing off his moves. His stance changed so quickly... Not long ago, he was still talking about being disciplined.
View OriginalReply0
ProposalDetectivevip
· 01-17 18:16
Coming with this again? The regulatory framework hasn't even been implemented yet and you're already shifting blame. That's really funny.
View OriginalReply0
SerLiquidatedvip
· 01-16 03:35
Are you seriously playing the regulatory game again? Instead of doing these empty gestures, it's better to just let the market regulate itself. Now these lawmakers are all thinking about how to choke off the industry.
View OriginalReply0
fren_with_benefitsvip
· 01-15 01:58
Coming back with this again? Basically, they're just afraid of regulation, hiding behind the excuse of "protecting the industry" to oppose regulation. Compared to regulatory risks, I'm more worried that these people will continue their wild, unregulated practices...
View OriginalReply0
MechanicalMartelvip
· 01-15 01:53
Here we go again with this? Regulation is really a double-edged sword. Honestly, it's just that they're afraid that too much control might actually accelerate decline.
View OriginalReply0
SellTheBouncevip
· 01-15 01:49
Looking at what this CEO says, it's nothing more than "Don't move, any movement will cause trouble." But I've heard this kind of statement too many times—every time regulatory winds tighten, the big players all say the same. History has shown me that these moments are often good opportunities to buy the dip. Just wait, there will always be lower points.
View OriginalReply0
MrDecodervip
· 01-15 01:43
Coming with this again? Excessive regulation ends up killing the industry, I understand this logic.
View OriginalReply0
CompoundPersonalityvip
· 01-15 01:40
Here we go again, this set of arguments... Saying that poor regulation actually harms the industry sounds reasonable, but who really believes it?
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamervip
· 01-15 01:38
Coming back with this again? Inadequate regulation is actually more dangerous. I've heard this logic enough times, haha.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)