Many people have a skewed understanding of decentralization. They think decentralization means a completely unorganized state, pursuing so-called absolute freedom and superficial chaos. In fact, the core of decentralization is not this.



What is its true meaning? It is to grant each participant and community the right to autonomous decision-making—you can choose which set of rules to recognize, which ecosystem to enter, and how to transmit and accumulate value. Power is decentralized into individuals and communities, and this is the essence of decentralization.

Looking back to the origin, the original intention of Satoshi Nakamoto when designing Bitcoin was completely aligned with this logic. What was he doing at that time? Breaking the centralized monopoly of traditional financial systems. In that system, third-party institutions like banks and payment agencies hold your wallet keys, and they control your transaction verification and asset flow. Bitcoin changed all this—each participant can independently control assets, verify transactions autonomously, and define the direction of value transfer. This is not utopian fantasy; it is a tangible transfer of power.

The true essence of decentralization is most opposed to the emergence of a "new center." No matter what banner this new center claims under, it contradicts the original intention of this movement. Conversely, the vitality of decentralization lies precisely in pluralism—different communities can operate different consensus mechanisms, different ecosystems have the right to set various operational rules, and whether individual or collective value propositions, they can find suitable implementation scenarios.

This mode of coexistence in diversity is the real path that decentralization should take.
BTC2%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Tokenomics911vip
· 11h ago
That's right, many projects claiming to be decentralized are just a change of boss.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologisvip
· 11h ago
Early project originators are obsessed with on-chain artifacts. This article hits the core — decentralization is not destruction, but a redistribution of power. It reminds me of the original intention of the cypherpunks, and Bitcoin is actually a declaration of digital inheritance.
View OriginalReply0
SelfMadeRuggeevip
· 11h ago
You're so right. These days, there are so many projects claiming to be decentralized but actually creating new centralized entities that it's ridiculous. Someone should have exposed this facade long ago.
View OriginalReply0
0xSunnyDayvip
· 11h ago
Exactly, I really dislike projects that hide behind decentralization to establish new monopolies.
View OriginalReply0
BearWhisperGodvip
· 11h ago
Hmm, there's some substance here. Compared to those who shout "decentralization" every day and just advocate anarchy, your logic is much clearer. The situation of rebranding a new center is really annoying; many projects are using this routine now. Transferring power into individuals' hands is indeed the core issue. The control methods like bank cards really need to be shattered. But honestly, the idea of multi-coexistence sounds great, yet in practice, different ecosystems tend to operate separately. Few can truly achieve compatibility and consensus.
View OriginalReply0
VibesOverChartsvip
· 11h ago
Exactly right, I especially dislike projects that claim to be decentralized but secretly establish new power structures. It's truly ironic.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)