2026-01-15 00:41:01

There's a real tension here worth acknowledging. While some of these proposals bring genuine improvements, several of them seem to pull in different directions—particularly when you look at how they interact with the permissionless nature of smart contracts. Not all amendments are created equal, and we should be careful about the ones that create friction with core protocol principles.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaverseVagrant

· 01-17 18:05

To be honest, this statement is quite eye-opening... Some proposals are indeed digging into the core of the protocol, and they don't even realize it.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterNoLoss

· 01-15 17:01

Improvement is good, but don't mess with our spirit of permissionless innovation—that's the true essence of Web3.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCry

· 01-15 01:08

Why bother fussing over these details? The protocol itself is constantly compromising, and true decentralization has long been gone.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketBard

· 01-15 01:08

Bro, I think you're absolutely right. We really can't go through every proposal. Some improvements are indeed good, but there are also those that seem like they're undermining the foundation of the protocol. Once you tamper with the permissionless aspect, there's really no turning back. We need to be cautious.

View OriginalReply0

PensionDestroyer

· 01-15 01:06

Roughly speaking, the reasoning is sound—some proposals are indeed digging into the protocol's weak spots.

View OriginalReply0

CrashHotline

· 01-15 01:04

The issue of non-licensing is really a hurdle; as you keep making changes, it becomes easy to lose it altogether.

View OriginalReply0

NFTDreamer

· 01-15 00:57

Well... so the improvement plans have their pros and cons; it really depends on whether they truly respect the original intention of decentralization.

View OriginalReply0